| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 04/24/2009 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 05/21/2009 | | On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on April 24, 2009, and it appearing that appellant was found eligible for cost-waived status in the trial court, and it further appearing that no transcript is needed for this appeal, it is ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record index and record copies in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (By: GP) | |
| 06/03/2009 | | RECORD INDEX | |
| 06/03/2009 | | RECORD COPIES | |
| 06/03/2009 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
| 06/09/2009 | | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) | |
| 07/09/2009 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for 3 to 6 months. (Served By: DCCA on 7/9/09). | |
| 07/16/2009 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF | |
| 08/10/2009 | | On consideration of appellant's motions for extensions of time within which to file the brief, to which no oppositions has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motions are granted to the extent that the brief and limited appendix shall be filed within 90 days from the date of this order. Any further requests for extensions of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By: GP) | |
| 08/12/2009 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL a copy of the court record and order for prison to give Appellant access to the prison law library. | |
| 08/20/2009 | | ORDER DENYING APLT MO FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's brief and limited appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order. (By: ETW) | |
| 09/11/2009 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE this Court's 8/20/09 order directing appellant to file brief w/i 40 days and this Court's 8/10/09 order directing appellant to file brief w/i 90 days. | |
| 09/14/2009 | | ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS nso. 09-CO-452 and 09-CO-986 for all purposes herein. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall file a consolidated brief addressing both appeals and the limtied appendix within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (By: GP) | |
| 10/07/2009 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL | |
| 10/07/2009 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF (No Appendix attached). | |
| 10/28/2009 | | ORDERED: That appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order file the limited appendix. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days from the date the limited appendix is filed with this court. (By: ETW) | |
| 11/30/2009 | | On consideration of this court's order of October 28, 2009, directing appellant to file the limited appendix w/in 20 days, and it appearing that the limited appendix has not been fled, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 15 days from the date of this order submit the limited appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of itme. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file document, or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to commply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal w/out further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days from the date the appendix is filed with this court. (GP) | |
| 12/14/2009 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to court's order dated 11/30/09. (To be construed as a Motion/ Request for an Extension of Time to File the Limited Appendex & Motion for Leave. | |
| 12/29/2009 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION and the limited appendix shall be filed within 20 days from the date of this order. (By: GP) | |
| 02/02/2010 | | On consideration of this court's order of December 29, 2009, directing appellant to file the limited appendix within 20 days, and it appearing that the limited appendix has not been filed, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 15 days from the date of this order submit the limited appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the app endix or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject these appeals to dismissal without further notice. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days from the date the appendix is filed with this court. (GP) | |
| 02/04/2010 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for am an extension of time within which to file the limited appendix | |
| 02/18/2010 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to court's order dated 2/2/10. | |
| 02/26/2010 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for an extension of time within which to file the limited appendix and appellant's limited appendix shall be filed within 15 days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (By: GP) | |
| 03/08/2010 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to court's order date 2/26/10 regarding the filing of a Limited Appendix. | |
| 03/31/2010 | | ORDERED: Sua sponte, that these appeals are hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (By: ETW) | |
| 03/31/2010 | | DISMISSED | |
| 04/13/2010 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL (Emergency). | |
| 04/22/2010 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION of this Appeal and of Court's Order dated 3/31/10. | |
| 05/14/2010 | | ORDERED: That appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order file the limited appendix. The appendix should include, at minimum, the orders on appeal. See D.C. App. R. 30. Failure to comply with this order shall result in denial of appellant's motions. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's motions are hereby held in abeyance pending further order of this court. (By: ETW) | |
| 05/25/2010 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to court's order dated May 14, 2010 with attached appendix. (Served by: DCCA on 5/25/10). | |
| 05/25/2010 | | RECEIVED Appellant's Appendix attached to response to court's order dated 5/14/10. | |
| 06/08/2010 | | ORDER GRANT APPELLANT MOTIONS and these appeals are hereby reinstated. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the lodged limited appendix. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (By: ETW) | |
| 06/08/2010 | | APPENDIX | |
| 07/06/2010 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE | |
| 07/07/2010 | | TMC - motion for summary affirmance - appellant's motion to file (LODGED) oppo | |
| 07/26/2010 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN OPPOSITION to Appellee's Motion for Summary Affirmance. | |
| 07/26/2010 | | RECEIVED Appellant's Opposition to Appellee's Motion for Summary Affirmance (incorporated in the Motion for Leave). | |
| 08/27/2010 | | ORDERED that the MOTION FOR LEAVE IS GRANTED and the Clerk SHALL FILE the lodged opposition. It is *****MORE***** | |
| 08/27/2010 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION | |
| 08/27/2010 | | FURTHER ORDERED that APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRAMANCE IS GRANTED. See Oliver T. Carr Mgmt Inc. v. Nat'l Deli Inc. 397 a.2d 914, 915 (Dc 1979)...SEE HARDCOPY It is FURTHER ORDERED that the CLERK SHALL NO LONGER ACCEPT FILINGS APPEALING HIS 1995 CONVICTION from appellant without first receiving leave of an Associate Judge of this Court. See Corley v. US, 741 A.2d 1029, 1030-31 (DC 1999). It is *****MORE***** | |
| 08/27/2010 | | FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the orders on appeal are HEREBY AFFIRMED. (KRBRKG) (kt) | |
| 09/21/2010 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
| 11/18/2010 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file Motion for Reconsideration or Petition for Rehearing En Banc. | |
| 02/28/2011 | | APLT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING/REHEARING EN BANC (pro se petition) | |
| 02/28/2011 | | ORD DENY APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REH/REH EN BANC and grant aplt's mo to extend time to file the lodged petition and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged petition. (pro se petition) (WHRZRDGLKRBRTHOBKG) (Judge Fisher is recused.) | |
| 07/03/2012 | Filed | Motion for Clarification as to this Court's Order Dated August 27, 2010 (Appellant) | Granted |
| 07/09/2012 | Filed | ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION and the LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN THE 8/27/10 ORDER ONLY PERTAINS TO FILINGS SUBMITTED TO THIS COURT FROM APPELLANT'S 1995 CONVICTIONS NOT TO FILINGS IN SUPERIOR COURT | |
| 10/16/2012 | Filed | Letter From appellant requesting a docket sheet (Appellant) | |