judyrecords
600 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

MARIA ELENA LOPEZ V. WILLIAM QUEZADA

Case Information: 11-FM-0212
Short Caption:MARIA ELENA LOPEZ V. WILLIAM QUEZADAClassification:Appeals - Family - Domestic Relations
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:DRB560-04Filed Date:02/15/2011

Opening Event Date:02/15/2011Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:08/04/2011

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantMaria Elena Lopez N
Andre P. BarberNN
AppelleeWilliam Quezada N
Jesse A. GadsonNY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
02/15/2011NOTICE OF APPEAL
03/08/2011 ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall, w/n 20 days from the date of this order, SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed either for LACK OF STANDING; or as IMPROPERLY FILED...SEE HARDCOPY (BY: ETW)
03/08/2011TMC - OTSC - ROTSC & for SUMMARY REVERSAL - supplemental to ROTSC - oppo to summary reversal - reply
04/13/2011RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL LW
04/20/2011MISCELLANEOUS (SUPPLEMENT TO ROTSC) MOTION FOR THE COURT TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE LW
04/25/2011APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to motion for summary disposition
04/29/2011APPELLANT'S REPLY - to aple's oppo to aplt's motion for summary disposition(dwm)
05/02/2011RECEIVED - Appellee's Reply to Appellant's request to take judicial notice (construed as Aplt's supplement to ROTSC) (Titled as: Appellee's Opposition to Appellant's Motion for Summary Disposition)
05/31/2011 ORDERED that to the the extent the appeal is taken from the 9/24/10, 3/18/10 and 12/9/09 orders, IT IS DISMISSED...It is FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent the appeal is taken from the 1/24/11 order, it is DISMISSED AS having been taken from a NON-APPEALABLE ORDER. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION, to take judicial notice, and for leave to file an amended complaint are DENIED AS MOOT. (FIBEKG)
05/31/2011DISMISSED
06/20/2011APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION including REQUEST TO RECALL MANDATE IN 10FM371 and 10FM372 and to consolidate LW
06/21/2011TMC - motion for reconsideration
06/29/2011 ORDERED that the MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED. It is FURHTER ORDERED that APPELLANT'S REQUEST TO RECALL THE MANDATE in APPEALS 10FM371 and 10FM372 and TO CONSOLIDATE those appeals w/the instant appeal IS DENIED W/O PREJUDICE to appellant filing appropriate motions in those cases. See DC App. R. 41 (f). (FIBEKG)
08/04/2011FiledMandate
08/30/2011LodgedLetter From - William Quezada regarding the Court properly considered all relevant factors (Appellee)