judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

BENOIT VS. BENOIT

Case Information: 35711
Short Caption:BENOIT VS. BENOITCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Elko Co. - Fourth Judicial District - 30573Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Child Custody
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: En Banc
To SP/Judge:03/14/2000 / Gladstone, ArthurSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:02/06/2001How Submitted:On Briefs

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
02/29/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Thomas L. Stringfield-Law Offices--check no. 1409.
02/29/2000Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 00-03163
03/14/2000Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Arthur A. Gladstone. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts and docketing statement suspended pending further order of this court.)
05/22/2000Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. 00-08553
05/22/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to File Docketing Statement. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) Due Date: 15 days
06/01/2000Settlement Order/ProceduralFiled Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this appeal. Upon the filing of the docketing statement, this court shall conduct a preliminary jurisdictional review of this appeal. Appellant: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). 00-09242
06/06/2000Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 00-09519
06/06/2000Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request. 00-09520
08/03/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 00-13469
08/22/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. To date, appellant has failed to file a transcript request form with this court as required under NRAP 9(a). Accordingly, appellant shall have 10 days from the date of this order to file and serve the requested document. Cause appearing, the motion filed by court reporter Stipke on August 3, 2000, is granted. Accordingly, the transcripts submitted provisionally on August 11, 2000, shall be filed forthwith. 00-14767
08/22/2000TranscriptFiled Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: 12/09/99 and 12/10/99. Court Reporter: Polly C. Stipke.
08/30/2000Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Supplemental Transcripts requested: 12/09/99 and 12/10/99. To Court Reporter: Court Reporter, Dept. 1. 00-15319
09/25/2000BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: 9/22/00. 00-16869
09/25/2000AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. 00-16870
10/16/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 00-18325
10/18/2000Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order Granting Motion. Respondent's answering brief shall be served and filed on or before November 1, 2000. 00-18446
10/19/2000BriefFiled Answering Brief. Mailed on: 10/18/00. 00-18544
10/19/2000AppendixFiled Appendix to Answering Brief. 00-18545
10/24/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. On August 22, 2000, we ordered the clerk of this court to file 'rough draft' transcripts submitted provisionally on August 11, 2000. The 'rough draft' transcripts are actually certified transcripts that were submitted in a condensed format. The condensed format for transcripts may only be used in fast track appeals. Because this is not a fast track appeal, court reporter Stipke should have filed the certified transcripts in a standard format. In the interests of judicial efficiency we waive the requirements of NRAP 9(b) requiring certified copies of transcripts to be filed in a standard format. 00-18825
11/17/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 00-20215
11/20/2000Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order Granting Motion. Appellant's reply brief provisionally submitted on November 15, 2000, shall be filed, forthwith. 00-20314
11/20/2000BriefFiled Reply Brief. 00-20055
12/20/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes in Carson City on February 7, 2001 at 11:00 a.m. (En Banc)
01/24/2001Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice.
02/06/2001MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Continuance. (FILED VIA FAX 02/06/01). 01-02386
02/06/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order Vacating Argument and Setting for Submission. We hereby vacate the oral argument scheduled for February 7, 2001, at 11:00 a.m. in Carson City. Having further reviewed this matter we have determined that oral argument is not necessary. This matter shall stand submitted for decision upon the briefs, appendices and other documents filed herein. 01-02445
02/06/2001Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
05/08/2001Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." EN BANC-WM/CY/MS/DA/RR/ML/NB 01-07664
06/05/2001RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 01-08031
06/05/2001Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
06/21/2001RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on June 7, 2001. 01-08031