judyrecords
search tips
770 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

LINT VS. ANDERSON

Case Information: 35717
Short Caption:LINT VS. ANDERSONCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A338721Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:07/26/2000How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
03/02/2000Filing Fee Filing Fee due.
03/02/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days
03/02/2000Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 00-03266
05/03/2000Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. from attorney James W. Erbeck. He no longer represents respondent in this matter. All future documents should be directed to law firm of Woodburn & Wedge. 00-07210
07/11/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn1[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 00-11913
07/26/2000Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal. Mailed on 07/24/00. 00-12986
07/26/2000Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
08/25/2000Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. from law firm of Woodburn and Wedge. They do not represent respondents in this appeal. They have not had contact with respondents in several years and cannot provide this court with an address. 00-14960
09/25/2000Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. from attorney Patrick T. Nohrden informing this court that attorney James Erbeck is in Massachussets and has not received the correspondence addressed to him from this court. 00-16874
01/28/2002Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Appearance. Raleigh, Hunt, McGarry & Drizin is attorney of record for respondents. 02-01841
01/31/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Directing District Court to Rule on Appellant's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. We direct the district court to enter an order in compliance with NRAP 24 within 30 days from the date of this order, and to provide a copy of the order to this court. 02-02078
02/11/2002Order/IncomingFiled District Court Order. Certified copy of Order to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed in district court on February 6, 2002. 02-02669
04/22/2002Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. "AFFIRM the order of the district court." fn2[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant.] SNP02M-WM/DA/ML 02-07048
05/14/2002Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." NRAP 40( c). fn1[Although appellant was not granted leave to appear in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from him. We note that the motions referenced in appellant's rehearing petition were filed after the notice of appeal in this case, and thus may not be considered by this court.] SNP02M-WM/DA/ML 02-08439
05/29/2002RemittiturIssued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal this day. 02-08539
05/29/2002Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
06/17/2002RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on June 3, 2002. 02-08539