| Case Information: 39543 | |||
| Short Caption: | COLEMAN VS. DEP'T OF ADMINISTRATION | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A441525 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 09/23/2002 | How Submitted: | On Record |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 04/26/2002 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | ||
| 04/26/2002 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 02-07461 | |
| 04/26/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days | ||
| 06/07/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. We deny without prejudice appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Appellant must first seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. Appellant is cautioned that her failure to either properly seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court or to pay the filing fee may result in the dismissal of this appeal. Fn1 [Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from her.] | 02-09964 | |
| 08/28/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. On June 7, 2002, we denied appellant's motion for in forma pauperis status without prejudice, noting that under NRAP 24(a), appellant submitted a "Closing Brief." Included with this document is a copy of a file-stamped district court order dated October 23, 2001, that granted appellant in forma pauperis status. Accordingly, we concluded that no fee is due for this appeal. Having reviewed the documents on file in the proper person appeal, we have concluded that our review of the complete record is warranted. Record due: 30 days. fn--[NRAP 11(a)(2) (the complete record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well as any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings).] fn--[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] | 02-14775 | |
| 08/28/2002 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. Per order filed August 28, 2002. | ||
| 09/23/2002 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal. | 02-16437 | |
| 09/23/2002 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 12/16/2002 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. fn1[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered all documents received from her.] "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." SNP03-MS/ML/NB | 02-21460 | |
| 01/10/2003 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal this day. | 03-00048 | |
| 01/10/2003 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 01/24/2003 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on January 13, 2003. | 03-00048 | |
| 06/13/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On December 16, 2002, in this proper person appeal, this court entered an order affirming the district court's dismissal of appellant's untimely judicial review petition for lack of jurisdiction. Subsequently, on December 19, 2002, this court received a proper person document from appellant, entitled Exhibit D, Diary Evidence on Margaret Coleman Case. We direct the clerk of this court to return the document, unfiled, to appellant. | 03-09862 | |