| Docket Entries |
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 04/14/2000 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Michael Ladner--Travelers Express M.O. No. 73880641978. | | |
| 04/14/2000 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | | 00-06038
|
| 04/25/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Record due: 30 days. fn1--[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] | | 00-06649
|
| 05/17/2000 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal. Mailed on 05/15/00. | | 00-08253
|
| 05/17/2000 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | | |
| 08/07/2000 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. w/letter: "Supplemental Excerpt of Record--Excerpt #2." | | |
| 08/17/2000 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. from Gerald D. Waite, attorney for Respondent Americredit. Documents attached include letter dated January 19, 2000, Order Granting Defendant Americredit Financial Services' Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal filed in district court on July 18, 2000 and Certificate of Service. (Nos. 35955 and 36321). | | 00-14426
|
| 08/31/2000 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. from Thea Marie Sankiewicz, attorney for Courtesy Imports, enclosing copies of Notice of Entry of Order filed in district court on July 13, 2000; Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal and Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal filed in district court on July 6, 2000; and letter to Judge Saitta from attorney Robert Nersesian dated March 15, 2000. Nos. 35955/36321 | | 00-15373
|
| 12/14/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. On August 17, 2000, this court received a letter from respondent AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. It appears that the January 19, 2000, letter was considered by the district court during the proceedings below, and thus would be properly included in the record on appeal. Any requests for relief to this court shall be made by formal motion, not by a letter addressed to the clerk of the court. However, in the interest of judicial economy we elect to treat the letter received on August 17, 2000, as a motion and we grant that motion. The clerk of this court shall file the letter. Further, the clerk of the district shall transmit a certified copy of the January 19, 2000, letter which is the subject of the district court's July 18, 2000, order in Case No. A400720 to this court as a supplement to the record on appeal within 20 days from the date of this order. | | 00-21864
|
| 12/14/2000 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Filed Letter from Gerald D. Waite, attorney for Respondent Americredit. Documents attached include letter dated January 19, 2000, Order Granting Defendant Americredit Financial Services' Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal filed in district court on July 18, 2000 and Certificate of Service. | | 00-14426
|
| 01/09/2001 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. from Clark County Clerk. The letter of 1/19/00 which this court requested is not in their records, and they are unable to provide this court with a certified copy of the document. | | 01-00509
|
| 02/28/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On December 14, 2000, this court entered an order granting respondent AmeriCredit Financial Services' motion to supplement the record on appeal. On January 9, 2001, the clerk of the district court informed this court in writing that a copy of that letter is not available from that office. This court shall consider the letter dated January 19, 2000, by referring to the copy of the letter attached to the letter from counsel for respondent AmeriCredit that was received on Augusty 17, 2000, and filed on December 14, 2000. | | 01-03776
|
| 04/15/2002 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. fn1[We grant appellant's motion to consolidate these cases. NRAP 3(b). Although appellant was not granted leave to proceed in proper person under NRAP 46(b), we have received and considered appellant's documents.] As the district court appropriately granted summary judgment to respondents, we affirm the award of costs. Because no timely objection to Courtesy Imports' memorandum of costs was filed, the district court was not required to hold a hearing on the matter. We have considered appellant's remaining claims, and conclude that they are without merit. "We therefore affirm the district court's orders." SNP02M-WM/DA/ML. Nos. 35955/36321.
See Order Denying Petition for Rehearing and Clarifying Order of Affirmance filed July 18, 2002 for clarification of this order filed April 15, 2002. | | 02-06696
|
| 07/18/2002 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. Order Denying Petition for Rehearing and Clarifying Order of Affirmance. 'We hereby deny rehearing in appeal no. 35955, but clarify our prior order of affirmance as set forth above. In light of our disposition of appeal no. 35955, the petition for rehearing is denied as it relates to appeal no 36321.' fn5[A formal motion for costs was unnecessary because such awards are mandatory to the prevailing party.] SNNP02M-WM/DA/ML. Nos. 35955/36321. | | 02-12290
|
| 08/02/2002 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal this day. | | 02-12794
|
| 08/02/2002 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | | |
| 08/09/2002 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. Returned with letter: original and three copies of the Motion/Request for Reconsideration on Order Denying Petition for Rehearing and Clarifying Order of Affirmance. Nos. 35955/36321. | | |
| 08/23/2002 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on August 13, 2002. | | 02-12794
|
| 01/10/2003 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice from U.S. Supreme Court\Certiorari Denied. A petition for a writ of certiorari was filed October 12, 2002 and placed on the docket as Case No. 02-8203. Nos. 35955/36321. | | 03-00555
|
| 03/17/2003 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice from U.S. Supreme Court\Certiorari Granted. The petition for a writ of ceritorari is denied. Nos. 35955/36321 | | 03-04419
|
| 04/29/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Resolving Motions. On October 1, 2002, Mr. Ladner submitted a motion to proceed in proper person. See NRAP 46(b). On that same date, Mr. Ladner submitted a proper person motion to recall the remittitur and correct alleged errors in this court's July 18, 2002, order. On October 10, 2002, Mr. Ladner submitted a supplement to his motion to recall remittitur and correct errors. Cause appearing, we grant Mr. Ladner's motion to proceed in proper person for the limited purpose of allowing Mr. Ladner to file his October 1, 2002, motion to recall remittitur and correct errors and his October 10, 2002, supplement. The clerk of this court shall file the documents received on October 1, 2002, and October 10, 2002. In his October 1, 2002, motion and October 10, 2002, supplement Mr. Ladner requests this court to extend the time for filing a petition for en banc reconsideration of the July 18, 2002, order and recall the remittitur while the court considers his petition. No good cause appearing, we deny Mr. Ladner's motion. Nos. 35955/3632. | | 03-07302
|
| 04/29/2003 | Motion | Filed Proper Person Motion. Appellant's Motion to Proceed in Proper Person in the Matters about this Cause of Action before Honorable Court of Law. Nos. 35955/36321. | | 02-16973
|
| 04/29/2003 | Motion | Filed Proper Person Motion. Motion to Recall the Remittitur and Motion to Correct Errors of the Order Denying Petition for Rehearing and Clarifying Order of Affirmance. Nos. 35955/36321. | | 02-16975
|
| 04/29/2003 | Other Incoming Document | Filed Proper Person Document. Supplement to: Motion to Recall the Remitittur and Motion to Correct Errors of the Order Denying Petition for Rehearing and Clarifying Order of Affirmance. Nos. 35955/36321. | | 02-17539
|
| 05/09/2003 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. Original and two copies of the document entitled, "Petition for Request for Reconsideration on Order Resolving Motions." Nos. 35955/36321. | | |
| 09/29/2003 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. Returned, with letter, "Contention of Misunderstanding on Behalf of the Court in Regards to the Order Resolving Motions," "Appellant's Motion to Proceed in Proper Person in the Matter about this Cause of Action before the Honorable Court of Law," and "Motion to Recall the Remittitur and Motion to Correct the Order Resolving Motions which Includes the Motion to Correct Errors of the Order Denying Petition for Rehearing." Nos. 35955/36321. | | |