judyrecords
search tips
750 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS VS. SAXTON INC.

Case Information: 34506
Short Caption:CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS VS. SAXTON INC.Court:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 39332
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A377022Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:BeckerCase Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:10/09/2000 at 11:30 AMOral Argument Location:Carson City
Submission Date:10/09/2000How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
07/15/1999OtherDisqualification of Justice Becker. Sat in district court proceedings.
07/15/1999Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived. Returned check no. 26114 to Deaner, Deaner, Scann, Curtas & Malan.
07/15/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 99-06341
07/19/1999MotionFiled Motion for Stay. Motion for Stay of Order for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Mandamus Pending Appeal. (Filed via FAX). 99-06468
07/19/1999MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Expedited Briefing Schedule. (Filed via FAX) 99-06469
07/20/1999MotionFiled Motion for Stay. Motion for Stay of Order for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Mandamus Pending Appeal (Original). (Filed via FAX on 7/19/99) 99-06492
07/20/1999AppendixFiled Appendix. Appellant's Appendix to Motion for Stay of Order for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Mandamus Pending Appeal. 99-06493
07/20/1999MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Expedited Briefing Schedule (Original). (Filed via FAX on 7/19/99) 99-06494
07/20/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. We temporarily grant appellant's motion for a stay pending our receipt and consideration of any opposition thereto. We grant appellant's motion for an expedited briefing schedule. Appellant shall, within 30 days of the date of this order, file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Respondent shall, within 30 days of the filing of the opening brief, file and serve the answering brief. Appellant may, within 15 days of the filing of the answering brief, file and serve a reply brief. 99-06500
07/21/1999Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to File Docketing Statement. Due Date: 15 days
07/22/1999Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. Letter from attorney Charles W. Deaner enclosing copy of 7/19/99 minute order. 99-06639
07/26/1999Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. Certificate of Delivery (for Appellant's Motion for Stay of Order for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Mandamus Pending Appeal). 99-06746
07/27/1999MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion for Stay of Order for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Mandamus Pending Appeal. 99-06815
07/27/1999AppendixFiled Appendix. Respondent's Appendix to Opposition to Motion for Stay of Order for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Mandamus Pending Appeal. 99-06816
08/02/1999Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request. 99-07049
08/05/1999Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 99-07185
08/13/1999Docketing StatementFiled Response to Docketing Statement. 99-07511
08/20/1999BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: Fed-Ex 8/19/99. 99-07791
08/20/1999AppendixFiled Joint Appendix. Volumes 1 through 4. 99-07792
09/16/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. Order Granting Motion for Stay. The motion is granted, and the judgment of the Eighth Judicial District Court in case number A377022 is stayed pending further order of this court. 99-08740
09/21/1999BriefFiled Answering Brief. Mailed on: 9/20/99. 99-08962
10/08/1999BriefFiled Reply Brief. Mailed on: 10/5/99. 99-09768
08/28/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes on October 9, 2000 at 11:30 a.m. in Carson City. (NNP00A-MS/DA/ML)
09/21/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice.
10/09/2000Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. Northern Nevada Panel: NNP00A-MS/DA/ML.
11/20/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order of Reversal. Having considered the arguments of the parties and concluding that the City did not abuse its discretion in its decision on Saxton's rezoning application, we reverse the district court's order for a writ of mandamus." NNP00A-MS/DA/ML 00-20355
12/01/2000MotionFiled Motion. 00-21031
12/18/2000RemittiturIssued Remittitur. Memorandum of Costs and Disbursements allowed and taxed in the amount of $250.00. 00-20716
12/18/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
01/11/2001RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on December 28, 2000. 00-20716