| Case Information: 35848 | |||
| Short Caption: | WIIDEMAN (RANDAL) VS. NEVADA COMMISSION ON ETHICS | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | NONE | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Civil - Proper Person Writ Petition |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 03/24/2000 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | ||
| 03/24/2000 | Petition/Writ | Filed Proper Person Petition for Writ. Petition for a Peremptory Writ of Prohibition. | 00-04755 | |
| 04/26/2000 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Denying Petition. "We deny the petition." 1[Although petitioner submitted a motion for leave to appear in forma pauperis, NRAP 24 applies to appeals from district court actions. Petitioner has not demonstrated good cause to waive the filing fee. This constitutes an independent basis to deny the petition. Although petitioner was not granted leave to proceed in proper person, we have considered the proper person doucments received from petitioner.] | 00-06755 | |
| 05/23/2000 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | 00-08625 | |
| 05/23/2000 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||