judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

GEPFORD VS. GEPFORD

Case Information: 34449
Short Caption:GEPFORD VS. GEPFORDCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Humboldt Co. - Sixth Judicial District - CV14178Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Child Custody
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: En Banc
To SP/Judge:07/08/1999 / Gruesen, ThomasSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:06/06/2000How Submitted:On Briefs

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
07/02/1999Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Humboldt County Clerk-check no. 6312.
07/02/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 99-05839
07/02/1999Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. 04/19/99 and 04/30/99 Proceedings: To Court Reporter: Lee M. Bahr. 99-05841
07/08/1999Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Thomas W. Gruesen, Sr. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
08/02/1999TranscriptFiled Transcript. Proceedings: April 19, 1999 and April 30, 1999 (2 volumes). Court Reporter: Lee M. Bahr. 99-07032
09/03/1999Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. 99-08319
09/30/1999Settlement Order/ProceduralFiled Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this appeal. Appellant: 15 days to file the docketing statement. Because this is a child custody matter,90 days to file opening brief and appendix. Respondent shall have 20 days after service of the opening brief to file and serve the answering brief; appellant shall have 10 days after servcie of the answering brief to file and serve the reply brief. NRAP 31(a)(2). (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant). 99-09369
10/13/1999Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 99-09924
12/29/1999Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. Returned unfiled deficient Opening Brief and Appendix. Due 10 days.
01/06/2000BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: 01/05/00. 00-00223
01/06/2000AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. 00-00224
02/16/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion and Stipulation to Extend Time. 00-02438
02/23/2000Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order. The motion is granted and the stipulation is approved. The clerk shall file the answering brief, provisionally submitted on February 10, 2000. The clerk shall also file the reply brief received on February 17, 2000. 00-02838
02/23/2000BriefFiled Answering Brief. 00-02115
02/23/2000BriefFiled Reply Brief. 00-02548
06/06/2000Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. Oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted for decision to the En Banc Court as of the date of this order on the briefs filed herein. 00-09568
06/06/2000Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. Panel: En Banc Court.
11/30/2000Opinion/DispositionalFiled Authored Opinion. "Reversed and remanded." fn6[Charles also argues that the district court erred in concluding that it could not aprove Charles' relocation because Charles did not file a petition under NRS 125C.200 for permission to move before the hearing. In light of our decision to remand the case to the district court, we find it unnecessary to consider this issue.] Before the Court En Banc. By the Court, Young, J. We concur: Rose, C.J., Leavitt, J. and Becker, J. Shearing, J., with whom Agosti, J., and Maupin, J., agree, dissenting. 116 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 110. En Banc. 00-20932
12/27/2000RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 00-20984
12/27/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
01/11/2001RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on December 28, 2000. 00-20984