judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

SEWALD VS. CLARK CO ASSN FOR RETARDED CHILDREN

Case Information: 34433
Short Caption:SEWALD VS. CLARK CO ASSN FOR RETARDED CHILDRENCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 36133 , 38459
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A399693Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:08/12/1999How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
06/30/1999Filing Fee Filing Fee due.
06/30/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 99-05721
07/12/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Record due: 30 days. fn1--[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 99-06202
08/09/1999Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days
08/09/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. 99-07277
08/09/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. 99-07281
08/12/1999Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal. Vols. 1 through 10. 99-07485
08/12/1999Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
01/19/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Appeal. "ORDER this appeal dismissed." fn1[This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant's ability to file an appeal after a final judgment, should he wish to do so. Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant. Appellant's writ of prohibition, filed August 9, 1999, is procedurally deficient, because it lacked an affidavit of the party beneficially interested, as well as the prrescribed $200.00 filing fee]. SNP99B-WM/MS/NB 00-00848
03/01/2000Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order/Rehearing Denied. On February 4, 2000, appellant submitted a proper person motion for an extension of time. We construe the motion for an extension of time as a petition for rehearing, and " . . . deny the petition." fn1[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant.] SNP99B-WM/MS/NB 00-03248
03/17/2000RemittiturIssued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal, Vols. 1 through 10. 00-04250
03/17/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
03/27/2000RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on March 22, 2000. 00-04250