| Case Information: 10-FM-0744 | |||
| Short Caption: | NATALIE KIMBERLY KHAWAM V. GRAYSON PAUL WOLFE | Classification: | Appeals - Family - Custody |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | DRB921-09 | Filed Date: | 06/14/2010 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 06/14/2010 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 09/23/2010 | ||
| Party Information | ||||||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
| Appellant | Natalie Kimberly Khawam | N | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
| Appellee | Grayson Paul Wolfe, II | N |
| |||||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 06/14/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 06/28/2010 | ORDERED that appellant shall, W/N 20 DAYS from the date of this order, SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for having been taken from a NON-FINAL ORDER. See DC Code 11-721 (2001). (BY: ETW) | |||
| 06/28/2010 | TMC - OTSC - ROTSC - motion to file LODGED (AMENDED ROTSC) - appellee's opposition - appellee's motion to strike amended response | |||
| 07/06/2010 | APPEARANCE of Sandra Wilkof as counsel for aple. | |||
| 07/08/2010 | LETTER received from appellee's counsel regarding DCCA order dated June 28, 2010 | |||
| 07/19/2010 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - order dated 6/28/10 | |||
| 07/26/2010 | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to amend response to show cause order | |||
| 07/27/2010 | RECEIVED - aplt's amended response to court's order to show cause | |||
| 07/28/2010 | RECEIVED - aple's response to aplt response to show cause order. | |||
| 07/29/2010 | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO STRIKE - aplt's amended response to order to show cause and opposition to aplt's motion for leave to amend response. | |||
| 08/10/2010 | RECEIVED - aplt's reply to aple's response to order to show cause | |||
| 09/02/2010 | FURTHER ORDERED that APPELLEE'S MOTION TO STRIKE appellant's amended response IS DENIED AS MOOT. It is ****MORE**** | |||
| 09/02/2010 | ORDERED that APPELLANT'S MOTION TO FILE the amended response IS DENIED. It is *****MORE***** | |||
| 09/02/2010 | FURTHER ORDERED that the APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED W/O PREJUDICE as having been taken from non-final orders. See DC Code 11-721 (2001);...SEE HARDCOPY (KRBRNB) (kt) | |||
| 09/02/2010 | DISMISSED | |||
| 09/23/2010 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||
| 04/18/2014 | Filed | Archived | ||