| Case Information: 34491 | |||
| Short Caption: | RIVERSIDE RESORT VS. DISTRICT COURT | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A374032 | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 07/13/1999 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Campbell, Wolfenzon, Souhrada & Volk--check no. 20568. | ||
| 07/13/1999 | Petition/Writ | Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus. | 99-06239 | |
| 07/20/1999 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Letter. Returned, unfiled, with letter, "Real Parties in Interests' Opposition to Petition for Writ of Mandamus." (Not ordered by this court.) | 99-06517 | |
| 07/21/1999 | Petition/Writ | Filed Petition for Writ. Defendant Laughlin Transit's Joinder in Defendant Riverside Resort and Casino's Petition for Writ of Mandamus. | 99-06577 | |
| 07/26/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Answer Writ Petition. Answer due: 10 days from the date of this order. | 99-06758 | |
| 07/27/1999 | Motion | Filed Motion. Real Parties in Interests' Emergency Motion for Order Directing the District Court to Lift its Stay of Proceedings. | 99-06814 | |
| 07/30/1999 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Petitioner's Opposition to Real Party in Interests' Motion for Order Directing the District Court to Lift Its Stay of Proceedings. | 99-06969 | |
| 08/05/1999 | Petition/Writ | Filed Answer to Petition for Writ. | 99-07197 | |
| 08/05/1999 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Petitioner Laughlin Transit's Opposition to Real Party in Interests Motion for Order Directing the District Court to Lift its Stay of Proceedings. | 99-07199 | |
| 08/16/1999 | Petition/Writ | Filed Petition for Writ. Petitioner's Errata to Petition for Writ of Mandamus | 99-07621 | |
| 08/18/1999 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Granting Petition. Order Granting Petition for Writ of Mandamus. " . . .we direct the clerk of this court to issue a writ of mandamus." fn1[we deny the Belangers' emergency motion for an order directing the district court to lift its stay of proceedings]. SNP99B-WM/MS/NB | 99-07706 | |
| 08/18/1999 | Writ | Issued Writ. Original and one copy of writ and copy of order mailed to Gregory M. Schulman for service upon Judge Valorie J. Vega. | 99-07720 | |
| 08/25/1999 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. for Writ of Mandamus. | 99-07929 | |
| 08/31/1999 | Motion | Filed Motion. Petitioners' Riverside Resort and Larry Whalen's Motion to Clarify Scope of Writ with Respect to Choice of Law. | 99-08160 | |
| 08/31/1999 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. (for 8/31/99 Motion to Clarify). | 99-08162 | |
| 09/14/1999 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Real Parties in Interests' Opposition to Petitioner Riverside Resort and Larry Whalen's Motion to Clarify Scope of Writ with Respect to Choice of Law. | 99-08650 | |
| 09/14/1999 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | 99-08658 | |
| 09/14/1999 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 09/27/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. On August 18, 1999, this court issued a writ of mandamus granting the relief requested. On August 31, 1999, petitioners filed a motion for clarification of this court's writ of mandamus, requesting that this court specify whether Nevada or Arizona law applies to particular aspects of the district court proceedings. This is an issue that the district court should address in the first instance; however, it does not appear that the district court has yet ruled on this issue. We conclude that the relief that the petitioners now seek in their motion for clarification is premature. We therefore deny the motion for clarification. SNP99B-WM/MS/NB | 99-09170 | |