search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record


Case Information: 39628
Short Caption:RODRIGUEZ VS. MCKENNACourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - D140645Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Child Custody/Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:06/21/2002How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
05/14/2002Filing Fee Filing Fee due. 03/04/04 Order of Affirmance-fn8: on May 23, 2002, the district court granted appellant's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.
05/14/2002Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 02-08430
05/14/2002Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days
05/28/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn2[NRAP 11(a)(2) (the complete record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well as any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings).] fn3[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 02-09255
06/21/2002Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal. Vols. 1 and 2. 02-10806
06/21/2002Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
07/12/2002Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Amended/Supplemental. 02-11976
03/04/2004Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." fn8[Although appellant and respondent were not granted permission to file documents in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered all proper person documents received in this matter. We deny appellant's March 6, 2003 motion for appointment of counsel. We note that although appellant initially failed to pay the filing fee mandated by NRS 2.250, the record indicates that on May 23, 2002, the district court granted appellant's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the filing fee is waived. See NRAP 24(a).] NNP04S-MS/NB/MG 04-04102
03/30/2004RemittiturIssued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal, Vols. 1 and 2 this day. 04-04271
03/30/2004Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
04/12/2004RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on April 2, 2004. 04-04271