search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record


Case Information: 39443
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A378785Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:05/09/2002How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
04/08/2002OtherDisqualification of Justice Young. Law firm of Lionel Sawyer & Collins.
04/08/2002Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Glenda K. Wilson--check no. 895.
04/08/2002Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 02-06134
04/17/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn2[NRAP 11(a)(2) (the complete record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well as any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings).] fn3[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 02-06827
05/09/2002Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal. Vols. 1 and 2. 02-08162
05/09/2002Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
06/05/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order. On May 22, 2002, we received from appellant a letter requesting permission to supplement the record with pertinent documents from the master case that are not currently included in the record. We elect to treat the letter as a motion. We defer ruling on the motion at this time, however, due to insufficient information as to the documents with which appellant wishes to supplement the record. Accordingly, appellant shall have 20 days from the date of this order in which to file a written list of the master case documents she wished to supplement the record with, and to serve a copy of the list upon respondents. The list shall also briefly describe the content and nature of each designated documents, and specify the documents filing date. Within fifteen days from the date of service of appellant's list, respondents may file and serve a list and descriptions of any additional documents filed in the master case with which they wish to supplement the record. Our consideration of appellant's motion to supplement is deferred pending our receipt and review of the parties' list(s). Fn1 [The clerk of this court shall file the letter received on May 22, 2002.] Fn2 [For the limited purpose of filing the list, we grant appellant leave to file papers in proper person.]
06/05/2002Other Incoming DocumentFiled Proper Person Document. Filed letter from Glenda Wilson regarding Record on Appeal (see 6/5/02 order).
06/24/2002Other Incoming DocumentFiled Proper Person Document. Appellant's List of Supplemental Documents to Record on Appeal. 02-10920
07/09/2002MotionFiled the Baxter Defendants Response to Appellant's Supplemental List of Documents. 11-18448
06/08/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Directing Response. Respondents shall have 30 days from the date of this order to demonstrate why the district court's dismissal order should not be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings. 04-10551
07/08/2004MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. Respondents' Response to "Order Directing Response" dated June 8, 2004. 04-12454
12/01/2004Order/DispositionalFiled Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order of Reversal and Remand. "We reverse the district court's order and remand this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order." Additionally, in light of this court's decision in Rickard v. Montgomery Ward & Co., we instruct the district court to give appellant a reasonable period of time to set and bring her case to trial, provided appellant acts expeditiously. fn6[We deny as moot appellant's June 24, 2002 motion to proceed in proper person. Although appellant was not granted permission to file papers with this court in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the documents provided by appellant. We deny appellant's May 22, 2002 motion to supplement the record, as the requested documents were not necessary for the consideration of this appeal.] SNP04S-MS/RR/MD 04-21934
12/28/2004RemittiturIssued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal, Vols. 1 and 2 this day. 04-22294
12/28/2004Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
01/28/2005RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on December 30, 2004. 04-22294