| Case Information: 39609 | |||
| Short Caption: | GOOSBY (TODD) VS. STATE | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C172099 | Classification: | Criminal Appeal - Other - Post-Conviction/Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 08/26/2002 | How Submitted: | On Record |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 05/09/2002 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 05/09/2002 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 02-08183 | |
| 05/22/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Record due: 120 days. See NRAP 11(a)(2) (the complete record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well as any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings). fn1[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] Nos. 39518/39529/39533/39551/39552/39591/39609/ 39629-cases are not consolidated. | 02-09006 | |
| 08/26/2002 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal Copy. | 02-14672 | |
| 08/26/2002 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 02/04/2003 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. We conclude that Goosby is not entitled to relief and that briefing and oral argument are unwarranted. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." fn1[On May 9, 2002, the clerk of this court received from the clerk of the district court a copy of the notice of appeal that Goosby filed in district court case number C172099 on May 6, 2002. We note, however, that the record on appeal in district court case number C172099 that was subsequently transmit to this court by the district court clerk on August 23, 2002, does not contain a copy of that notice of appeal. Instead it appears that the clerk of the district court may have mistakenly filed that notice of appeal as part of the record of the proceedings conducted in district court case number C155261. We direct the clerk of the district court to review and correct the records of those two proceedings.] SNP03-MS/ML/NB | 03-01912 | |
| 03/04/2003 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 03-02079 | |
| 03/04/2003 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 03/11/2003 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on March 6, 2003. | 03-02079 | |