Log In
judyrecords
search tips
770 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

RHOMBIC CORPORATION VS. ROCKFORD TECHNOLOGY

Case Information: 34465
Short Caption:RHOMBIC CORPORATION VS. ROCKFORD TECHNOLOGYCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 33422
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV9802657Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:07/15/1999 / Gruesen, ThomasSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

Party Information
RoleParty NameRepresented By
Appellant/Cross-RespondentRhombic CorporationJ. T. Cardinalli
Respondent/Cross-AppellantRockford Technology CorporationStephen S. Kent (Woodburn & Wedge)

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
07/07/1999Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Cardinalli, J. T.--check
07/07/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 99-05985
07/13/1999Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 on cross-appeal from Woodburn & Wedge--check no. 53553.
07/13/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Cross-Appeal. 99-06277
07/15/1999Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Thomas W. Gruesen, Sr. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
07/28/1999MotionFiled Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Respondent Rockford's Motion to Dismiss Based on Jurisdictional Defects. 99-06883
09/03/1999Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. 99-08320
09/28/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Pursuant to NRAP 16(g), the settlement judge has filed a report indicating that the parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. Appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement. The time deadlines for requesting and preparing transcripts and briefing shall remain suspended pending a jurisdictional review of this appeal and futher order of this court. 99-09252
10/15/1999Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. Mailed on date 10/14/99. 99-10000
10/19/1999Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order. The responent/cross-appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file and serve a docketing statement. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for respondent/cross-appellant). 99-10154
10/28/1999Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. Respondent/Cross Appellant 99-10578
11/05/1999Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Appeal. On July 28, 1999, Rockford filed in this court a motion to dismiss this appeal. Rhombic has not filed an opposition to the motion. We infer the lack of an opposition to the motion to dismiss that the motion has merit. " . . . we dismiss this appeal and cross-appeal for lack of jurisdiction, without prejudce to the parties' right to appeal after a final judgment has been entered." We deny Rockford's request for costs. SNP99B-WM/MS/NB 99-10885
12/01/1999RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 99-11997
12/01/1999Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
12/08/1999RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on December 3, 1999. 99-11997