| Case Information: 37505 | |||
| Short Caption: | NEADE VS. MOTLEY | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Lyon Co. - Third Judicial District - CI14179 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - General - Other |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | 03/15/2001 / Allison, George | SP Status: | Completed |
| Oral Argument: | 04/08/2002 at 11:30 AM | Oral Argument Location: | Carson City |
| Submission Date: | 04/08/2002 | How Submitted: | After Oral Argument |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 03/01/2001 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Jack E. Kennedy & Associates--check no. 0005993. | ||
| 03/01/2001 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. | 01-03798 | |
| 03/15/2001 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: George V. Allison. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts and docketing statement suspended pending further order of this court.) | ||
| 05/01/2001 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. | 01-07304 | |
| 05/01/2001 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to File Docketing Statement. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) Due Date: 15 days | ||
| 05/10/2001 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | 01-07869 | |
| 05/15/2001 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File Request for Transcript of Proceedings; Motion to Require Cooperation by Court Reporter Tonja D. Lemich. | 01-08086 | |
| 06/25/2001 | Settlement Order/Procedural | Filed Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement. This court shall conduct a preliminary jurisdictional review of this appeal. On May 15, 2001, appellant filed a motion for an extension of time to file a request for transcripts. As of May 15, 2001, this court had not yet reinstated the time deadline for complying with NRAP 9(a).We deny as moot appellant's May 15, 2001 motion. Appellant: 15 days from the date of this order to file and serve eithter a transcript request form or a certificate indicating that no new transcripts are requested; 120 days to file and serve opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). | 01-10627 | |
| 07/09/2001 | Transcript Request | Filed Certificate of No Transcript Request. | 01-11513 | |
| 09/12/2001 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 09/12/01 (Reno/Carson). | 01-15443 | |
| 09/12/2001 | Appendix | Filed Joint Appendix. Vols. 1 and 2. | 01-15444 | |
| 10/11/2001 | Motion | Filed Motion and Order Extending Time. Brief due: November 13, 2001. | 01-17184 | |
| 11/13/2001 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered November 11, 2001. | 01-18859 | |
| 12/11/2001 | Brief | Filed Reply Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 12/11/01. | 01-20794 | |
| 02/25/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes on April 8, 2002, at 11:30 a.m. (NNP02-MS/RR/NB) | ||
| 03/12/2002 | Brief | Filed Supplemental Authorities. (Respondent's) Supplemental Authorities Pursuant to N.R.A.P. 31(d). | 02-04474 | |
| 03/22/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion to Strike. Appellant's Motion to Strike Respondent's Supplemental Authorities; Appellant's Motion for Sanctions. 03/28/02 ORDER: WE ELECT TO TREAT THIS MOTION AS A RESPONSE TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITES AND WILL CONSIDER APPELLANT'S ARGUMENTS CONCERNING THE TOYOTA CASE IN OUR DELIBERATION ON THIS MATTER. | 02-05178 | |
| 03/25/2002 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Notice of Appearance of counsel at Oral Argument (Christopher D. Phipps). | 02-05266 | |
| 03/26/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Oral Argument Reminder Notice. | ||
| 03/27/2002 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition to Appellant's Motion to Strike Respondent's Supplemental Authorities Pursuant to N.R.A.P. 31(d) and Appellant's Motion for Sanctions. | 02-05386 | |
| 03/28/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. On March 12, 2002, respondents filed supplemental authorities. On March 22, 2002, appellant filed a motion to strike that document. This appeal is scheduled for oral argument on April 8, 2002. Respondents' supplemental authorities was timely filed. Our procedural rules allow an opposing party to file a response to supplemental authorities no later than 10 days before oral argument. For these reasons, we deny appellant's motion to strike the supplemental authorities and for sanctions. We elect to treat the motion as a response to the supplemental authorities and will consider appellant's arguments concerning the Toyota case in our deliberation on this matter. | 02-05497 | |
| 04/08/2002 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. Argued by: Christopher Douglas Phipps for Appellant and Ernest E. Adler for Respondents. NNP02-MS/RR/NB. | ||
| 07/10/2002 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding. "we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order." NNP02-MS/RR/NB | 02-11708 | |
| 08/06/2002 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 02-11876 | |
| 08/06/2002 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 08/09/2002 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on August 7, 2002. | 02-11876 | |