| Case Information: 37732 | |||
| Short Caption: | BOBBY STEPHENS MASONRY VS. DISTRICT COURT | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 41703 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A410326 | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 04/19/2001 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Legal Express--check no. 10857. | ||
| 04/19/2001 | Petition/Writ | Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus. | 01-06685 | |
| 04/19/2001 | Appendix | Filed Appendix. Petitioners' Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandate. | 01-06686 | |
| 04/19/2001 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice of Procedural Deficiency. Affidavit and proof of service on district judge. Due Date: 10 days | ||
| 05/01/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. Receipt of Copy by Judge Douglas for Petition for Writ of Mandate. | 01-07241 | |
| 05/01/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. Receipt of Copy by Judge Douglas for Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandate. | 01-07243 | |
| 05/16/2001 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Denying Petition. Denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus. " . . . we deny the writ petition." Counsel for petitioners shall have 30 days from the date of this order to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for his apparent lack of candor to this court. NNP01A-MS/DA/RR | 01-08142 | |
| 06/12/2001 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | 01-08176 | |
| 06/12/2001 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 06/14/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Declaration of Michael W. Caspino in Response to Order to Show Cause. | 01-09952 | |
| 06/20/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. In response to this court's order entered on May 16, 2001, counsel has demonstrated to our satisfaction that he did not misrepresent the status of a related district court case. We conclude, therefore, that sanctions are not warranted. | 01-10437 | |