judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

WALKER VS. DISTRICT COURT

Case Information: 37700
Short Caption:WALKER VS. DISTRICT COURTCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A330489Classification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus
Disqualifications:Case Status:Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:01/17/2002How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
04/13/2001Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Robert D. Vannah, Chartered--check no. 51690.
04/13/2001Petition/WritFiled Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 01-06406
04/20/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Answer Writ Petition. The real party in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to file an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. 01-06744
05/21/2001MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Answer to Writ of Mandamus. 01-08386
05/23/2001Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. (Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Answer to Writ of Mandamus). 01-08635
05/24/2001Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order Granting Motion. filed May 21, 2001. The real party in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have to and including June 20, 2001, to file and serve an answer to the petition for writ of mandamus. 01-08766
06/20/2001MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion to Enlarge Time to File Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 01-10359
06/21/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. filed June 20, 2001. The real party in interest shall have to and including July 9, 2001, to file an answer to the petition for writ of mandamus. No further extensions of time shall be permitted except upon demonstration of extreme and unforeseeable circumstances. 01-10497
07/12/2001MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion to Extend Time to File Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 01-11814
07/16/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. filed July 12, 2001. The basis for the extension is that the due date was "incorrectly calendared". We conclude that this reason does not constitute an extreme and unforeseeable circumstance. Nevertheless, in the interest of judicial economy, we grant the motion. The clerk shall file the answer received on July 12, 2001. 01-11945
07/16/2001Petition/WritFiled Answer to Petition for Writ. 01-11816
07/16/2001Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. Certificate of Mailing. 01-12048
01/17/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Oral Argument will not be scheduled and this matter shall stand submitted for decision to the Southern Nevada Panel as of the date of this order on the papers filed herein. 02-01196
01/17/2002Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. To the Southern Nevada Panel. SNP02-CY/DA/ML
03/01/2002Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Change of Address. Law office of Glen J. Lerner & Associates. 02-03792
03/28/2002Order/DispositionalFiled Order Denying Petition. Denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus. "ORDER the petition DENIED." SNP02-CY/DA/ML 02-05558
04/23/2002RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. 02-05725
04/23/2002Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.