judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

AHMAD VS. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE

Case Information: 39350
Short Caption:AHMAD VS. FIRST AMERICAN TITLECourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 41233
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV0201132Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:04/04/2002How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
03/15/2002Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
03/15/2002MotionFiled Motion for Stay. Motion for Emergency Stay. 02-04707
03/15/2002Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Provide Proof of Service. Due date: 10 days.
03/15/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. Order Denying Stay. We have considered appellant's motion for a stay, and we are not persuaded that a stay is warranted at this time. We deny appellant's motion. 02-04781
03/18/2002MotionFiled Proper Person Motion. Motion for Emergency Stay. (Renewed motion.) 02-04788
03/19/2002Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 02-04917
03/25/2002MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Emergency Motion for Stay. 02-05268
03/28/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Declaring District Court Order Void and Directing Transmission of Record. Appellant has submitted a one-page document to this court challenging the district court's order of March 27, 2002 on the basis that the district court lacked jurisdiction to reconsider its March 6 order after the notice of appeal was filed. fn1[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from him.] We agree. Thus, we declare the district court's March 27, 2002 order void. The March 6 order, permitting appellant and his family to remain on the property until April 30, stands. Within 15 days from the date of this order, the clerk of the district court shall transmit to the clerk of this court the original trial court record pertaining to this appeal. fn5[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 02-05485
03/29/2002MotionFiled Motion. Emergency Motion to Vacate Injunction and/or Dismiss Appeal as Moot. 02-05673
03/29/2002Other Incoming DocumentFiled Proper Person Document. Letter from Mobashir Ahmad in Opposition to Emergency Motion to Vacate Injunction and/or Dismiss Appeal as Moot. 02-05681
04/04/2002Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal. 02-06049
04/04/2002Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
04/18/2002Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." fn2[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from him, and deny the relief requested as moot in light of this order. Similarly, we deny the Byrds' motion to vacate injunction or to dismiss this appeal as moot.] NNP02-WM/MS/NB 02-06906
05/14/2002RemittiturIssued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal this day. 02-06974
05/14/2002Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
05/20/2002RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on May 15, 2002. 02-06974
07/23/2002Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." fn1[See NRAP 40(a)(1). Appellant neither requested nor was granted an extension, and did not submit his "motion for reexamination of record" until 36 days after this court's April 18, 2002 disposition, over two weeks late. Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from him.] NNP02-WM/MS/NB 02-12591