Case Information: 34342 | |||
Short Caption: | HILDEBRAND VS. EATON | Court: | Supreme Court |
Related Case(s): | 33743 | ||
Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A307988 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - General - Other |
Disqualifications: | Young | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed |
Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
To SP/Judge: | 07/07/1999 / Buchanan, William | SP Status: | Completed |
Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
+ Party Information |
Docket Entries | ||||
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
06/14/1999 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Christopherson Law Offices-check no. 3471. | ||
06/14/1999 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | 99-05130 | |
06/28/1999 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Notice of Change of Address and Telephone Number. | 99-05638 | |
06/28/1999 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | 99-05639 | |
06/28/1999 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. Amended Docketing Statement. | 99-05646 | |
07/07/1999 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: William F. Buchanan. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.) | ||
08/30/1999 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. | 99-08130 | |
08/31/1999 | Motion | Filed Motion to Consolidate. (nos. 33743 & 34342) | 99-08158 | |
09/03/1999 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion to Consolidate Cases (nos. 33743/34342). | 99-08302 | |
09/28/1999 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Transmit Required Document. Notice of Entry for 4/9/99 Judgment. Due Date: 10 days | ||
10/08/1999 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order. Filed in district court on: June 4, 1999. | 99-09758 | |
10/27/1999 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice of Appearance. Representing appellant: Rawlings Olson Cannon Gormley & Desruisseaux, and Charles Thompson. | 99-10534 | |
11/03/1999 | Notice/Outgoing | Letter. | ||
11/05/1999 | Settlement Order/Procedural | Filed Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this appeal. Appellant: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). | 99-10889 | |
11/05/1999 | Other | Disqualification of Justice Young. Law firm of Lionel Sawyer & Collins. | ||
12/01/1999 | Transcript Request | Filed Certificate of No Transcript Request. Certificate Regarding Transcript. | 99-12006 | |
03/06/2000 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. Mailed on: 3/3/00. Amended Certificate of Service attached at back of brief. | 00-03508 | |
03/06/2000 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Opening Brief. Amended Certificate of Service attached at back of appendix. | 00-03509 | |
03/31/2000 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. Mailed on: UPS 3/30/00. | 00-05237 | |
03/31/2000 | Appendix | Filed Joint Appendix. Respondent's Joint Appendix. | 00-05239 | |
05/08/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. To date, appellant has failed to file a reply brief. Appellant's failure to file a reply brief is treated as a waiver of the right to file a reply brief. Accordingly, briefing is completed in this appeal. | 00-07523 | |
06/19/2000 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. fn1[The clerk of this court shall modify the captions on this court's docket to conform to the captions on this order. We have determined that oral argument is not warranted in these appeals. We deny as moot appellant's motion to consolidate these appeals filed on August 31, 1999.] In Docket No. 33743 we deny respondents' motion to dismiss this appeal. fn2[We also deny appellant's March 2, 1999, motion to strike respondents' motion to dismiss. On August 31, 1999, appellant filed a motion to extend the time to file the opening brief. On the same day, this court granted the motion. We treat respondents' September 3, 1999, opposition to the motion to extend the time to file the opening brief as a motion for reconsideration of our order extending the time, and we deny reconsideration.] In both appeals respondents request attorney's fees and costs pursuant to NRAP 38 on the basis that the appeals are frivolous. Having considered the arguments by the parties, we decline to impose sanctions pursuant to NRAP 38. Having concluded that these appeals are without merit, we "ORDER these appeals dismissed." Nos. 33743, 34342 (not consolidated). | 00-10399 | |
07/17/2000 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 00-12245 | |
07/17/2000 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
08/23/2000 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on August 8, 2000. | 00-12245 |