search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record


Case Information: 34342
Short Caption:HILDEBRAND VS. EATONCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 33743
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A307988Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:YoungCase Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:07/07/1999 / Buchanan, WilliamSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
06/14/1999Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Christopherson Law Offices-check no. 3471.
06/14/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 99-05130
06/28/1999Notice/IncomingFiled Notice. Notice of Change of Address and Telephone Number. 99-05638
06/28/1999Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 99-05639
06/28/1999Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. Amended Docketing Statement. 99-05646
07/07/1999Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: William F. Buchanan. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
08/30/1999Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. 99-08130
08/31/1999MotionFiled Motion to Consolidate. (nos. 33743 & 34342) 99-08158
09/03/1999MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion to Consolidate Cases (nos. 33743/34342). 99-08302
09/28/1999Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Transmit Required Document. Notice of Entry for 4/9/99 Judgment. Due Date: 10 days
10/08/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order. Filed in district court on: June 4, 1999. 99-09758
10/27/1999Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Appearance. Representing appellant: Rawlings Olson Cannon Gormley & Desruisseaux, and Charles Thompson. 99-10534
11/03/1999Notice/Outgoing Letter.
11/05/1999Settlement Order/ProceduralFiled Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this appeal. Appellant: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). 99-10889
11/05/1999OtherDisqualification of Justice Young. Law firm of Lionel Sawyer & Collins.
12/01/1999Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request. Certificate Regarding Transcript. 99-12006
03/06/2000BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: 3/3/00. Amended Certificate of Service attached at back of brief. 00-03508
03/06/2000AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. Amended Certificate of Service attached at back of appendix. 00-03509
03/31/2000BriefFiled Answering Brief. Mailed on: UPS 3/30/00. 00-05237
03/31/2000AppendixFiled Joint Appendix. Respondent's Joint Appendix. 00-05239
05/08/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. To date, appellant has failed to file a reply brief. Appellant's failure to file a reply brief is treated as a waiver of the right to file a reply brief. Accordingly, briefing is completed in this appeal. 00-07523
06/19/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Appeal. fn1[The clerk of this court shall modify the captions on this court's docket to conform to the captions on this order. We have determined that oral argument is not warranted in these appeals. We deny as moot appellant's motion to consolidate these appeals filed on August 31, 1999.] In Docket No. 33743 we deny respondents' motion to dismiss this appeal. fn2[We also deny appellant's March 2, 1999, motion to strike respondents' motion to dismiss. On August 31, 1999, appellant filed a motion to extend the time to file the opening brief. On the same day, this court granted the motion. We treat respondents' September 3, 1999, opposition to the motion to extend the time to file the opening brief as a motion for reconsideration of our order extending the time, and we deny reconsideration.] In both appeals respondents request attorney's fees and costs pursuant to NRAP 38 on the basis that the appeals are frivolous. Having considered the arguments by the parties, we decline to impose sanctions pursuant to NRAP 38. Having concluded that these appeals are without merit, we "ORDER these appeals dismissed." Nos. 33743, 34342 (not consolidated). 00-10399
07/17/2000RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 00-12245
07/17/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
08/23/2000RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on August 8, 2000. 00-12245