judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

RICHARDSON VS. DISTRICT COURT

Case Information: 35765
Short Caption:RICHARDSON VS. DISTRICT COURTCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - D250559Classification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus/Prohibition
Disqualifications:Case Status:Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
03/13/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Patrick T. Nohrden--check no. 4638.
03/13/2000Petition/WritFiled Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition. and Request for Stay of Proceedings in the District Court. 00-03944
03/14/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Answer Writ Petition. Answer due from the real party in interest: 20 days from the date of this order. We hereby temporarily stay all proceedings in District Court Case No. D250559 pending receipt and consideration of a response to petitioner's request for a stay and further order of this stay. 00-04036
03/23/2000Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. Original letter from T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., District Judge to attorney Crawford and Nohrden (cc: Justice Young) dated March 14, 2000. Because of the Supreme Court Order filed March 14, 2000, the district court cannot participate in the telephone conference with the California Court and the hearing scheduled for March 21, 2000, must be taken off calendar. 00-04730
03/27/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Notice. Substitution of Attorneys. 00-04867
04/27/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Petition. Judgment: "We ORDER this petition dismissed." fn1[We vacate the stay that we entered on March 14, 2000, and direct the clerk of the court to file the answer received on April 4, 2000, and the reply received on April 13, 2000. On March 27, 2000, attorney Douglas C. Crawford filed a document entitled "Substitution of Attorneys" purporting to allow real party in interest Peter J. Richardson to represent himself in place of attorney Crawford. Because the substitution of attorneys does not substitute one attorney for another, we disapprove the substitution. Nevertheless, in the interest of judicial efficiency, we elect to treat the substitution of attorneys as attorney Crawford's motion to withdraw. Cause appearing, we grant the motion. The clerk of this court shall amend the docket in this matter by deleting attorney Crawford as counsel of record for the real party in interest. 00-06888
04/27/2000Other Incoming DocumentFiled Proper Person Document. Opposition to Emergency Petition for a Writ of Prohibition and Mandamus and Request for Stay of Proceedings in the District Court. 00-05402
04/27/2000MotionFiled Reply to Response. Petitioner's Response to Real Party's in Interest Opposition to Emergency Petition for a Writ of Prohibition and Mandamus and Request for Stay of Proceedings in the District Court. 00-05942
05/23/2000RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. 00-08623
05/23/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.