search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record


Case Information: 29236
Short Caption:BENTLY NEVADA VS. JOHNSONCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Carson City - First Judicial District - 9502275AClassification:Civil Appeal - Administrative Agency - General
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:04/12/2000How Submitted:On Briefs

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
09/27/1996Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $100.00 from Arthur J. Bayer, Jr.-Check No. 2682.
09/27/1996Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $100.00 from McDonald Carano Wilson McCune Bergin Frankovich & Hicks-Check No. 0009386.
09/27/1996Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.)
09/27/1996Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Cross-Appeal. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for cross-appellant.)
09/30/1996Notice/IncomingReceived Notice. District Court Notice of Deficiency. Filed in district court on: 9/18/96. "MISSING DOCUMENT."
10/03/1996Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request.
10/04/1996Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
10/07/1996MotionFiled Stipulation. Bentley Nevada shall be designated appellant and Dennis Johnson shall be designated respondent.
10/10/1996Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. Respondent/Cross-Appellant Bentley Nevada.
10/30/1996Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Stipulation Approved. Clerk of this court shall modify the caption in this matter. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1) and NRAP 28(h).
11/05/1996MotionFiled Motion for Stay. Motion for Stay pending Appeal.
11/18/1996MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion for Stay Pending Appeal.
12/02/1996Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. We grant the motion, and stay the order of the district court requiring appellant to pay workers compensation benefits to respondent pending further order of this court.
02/05/1997MotionFiled Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Motion to dismiss by Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
02/07/1997MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion to Dismiss and Request for Extension of time to file Appellant's Opening Brief.
02/10/1997BriefReceived Opening Brief. Mailed on: Reno/Carson Msgr. 2/10/97.
02/10/1997AppendixReceived Joint Appendix. Mailed on: Reno/Carson Msgr. 2/10/97.
02/13/1997MotionFiled Motion for Permission to File Document. Request for Permission to file Reply.
03/13/1997BriefReceived Answering Brief. Hand delivered 3/13/97.
03/18/1997Order/ProceduralFiled Order. We deny respondent's motion for dismissal and grant appellant's motion for an extension of time to file the opening brief. The clerk shall file the opening brief and joint appendix provisionally received on February 10, 1997. Respondent shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file an answering brief on appeal and an opening brief on cross-appeal. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). fn1[Respondent's February 13, 1997, motion seeking leave to file areply in support of the original motion to dismiss is hereby denied.]
03/18/1997BriefFiled Opening Brief.
03/18/1997AppendixFiled Joint Appendix.
03/18/1997BriefFiled Answering Brief.
04/14/1997BriefFiled Reply Brief.
06/23/1997Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted as of the date of this order, on the record and briefs filed herein.
06/23/1997Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
04/12/2000Case Status Update Resubmitted for Decision. Panel: NNP99B -CY/DA/ML.
05/24/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Remand. Order of Reversal and Remand. " . . . we reverse the district court's order and remand the case so the district court may review whether substantial evidence supports the appeals officer's decision without considering Dr. Rogalski's letter dated December 5, 1995 . . . we affirm the district court's denial of Johnson's request for the award of costs and attorney's fees and dismiss Johnson's cross-appeal." NNP99B-CY/DA/ML 00-08709
06/20/2000RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 00-10280
06/20/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
06/30/2000RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on June 21, 2000. 00-10280