| Docket Entries |
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 12/19/2000 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | | |
| 12/19/2000 | Petition/Writ | Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus. | | 00-22104
|
| 12/19/2000 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days | | |
| 12/19/2000 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice of Procedural Deficiency. $200 filing fee; Affidavit of the party beneficially interested; Proof of service on the respondent district judge; Proof of service on all parties to the action in the trial court. Due date: 10 days. | | |
| 12/20/2000 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Errata. Errata to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (Certificate of Service) | | 00-22165
|
| 12/26/2000 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Marquis & Aurbach--check no. 53755. | | |
| 12/26/2000 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Affidavit. Affidavit of Terry A. Coffing, Esq. | | 00-22413
|
| 01/09/2001 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: To a date to be determined following upcoming events in district court and letter from settlement judge with further instructions. (nos. 37160 and 37180). | | |
| 01/10/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Answer Writ Petition. Answer due from the real party in interest, on behalf of respondents: 30 days from the date of this order. | | 01-00593
|
| 01/22/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Consolidation. We consolidate the above-entitled matters for all appellate purposes. A notice of assignment to the settlement program has issued in Docket Nos. 37042, 37160 and 37273. In light of this order consolidating these matters, Docket Nos. 37179 and 37180 are assigned to the settlement program as well. A joint settlement conference shall be conducted in these consolidated matters. We defer ruling on the writ petitions in Docket Nos. 37179 and 37180, pending completion of the settlement conference proceedings. The time deadline for filing an answer in Docket Nos. 37179 and 37180, in accordance with our January 10, 2001 order, is not suspended. The real party in interest must file an answer on or before February 9, 2001. Nos. 37042, 37160, 37179, 37180, 37273. Document No. 01-01311. | | |
| 01/23/2001 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Thomas J. Tanksley. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts and docketing statement suspended pending further order of this court.) | | |
| 01/23/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Motion Granted in Part. Order Partially Granting Motion for Stay. Having considered the motion and the opposition, we conclude that appellants/petitioners have not demonstrated that a stay of the preliminary injunction order is warranted, but have shown that a stay of the shareholder meeting order should be granted. We stay the district court's December 14, 2000, order pending further order of this court. fn1[We defer ruling on respondents/real parties in interest's motion to dismiss the appeals in Docket Nos. 37160 and 37273.] Nos. 37042, 37160, 37179, 37180, 37273. Document No. 01-01490. | | |
| 02/12/2001 | Petition/Writ | Filed Answer to Petition for Writ. Nos. 37042/37160/37179/37180/37273. (01-02755) | | |
| 02/12/2001 | Motion | Filed Motion for Stay. Respondents' Emergency Motion to Expand the Stay Pending Appeal. Nos. 37042/37160/37179/37180/37273. (01-02756) | | |
| 02/12/2001 | Appendix | Filed Appendix. Respondents'/Real Party in Interest's Appendix to Emergency Motion to Expand the Stay Pending Appeal and Answer to Petitions for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition. Nos. 37042/37160/37179/37180/37273. (01-02756) | | |
| 02/20/2001 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: February 28, 2001. Nos. 37042, 37160, 37179, 37180, 37273. (01-03187) | | |
| 02/22/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition to Respondents' Emergency Motion to Expand Stay Pending Appeal. Nos. 37042/37160/37179/37180/37273. (01-03389) | | |
| 03/02/2001 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference scheduled for February 28, 2001 is postponed because counsel for one side stated an intent to file a motion to withdraw and did not want to go forward. Nos. 37042, 37160, 37179, 37180 and 37273. (01-03870) | | |
| 03/23/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. Order Denying Motion for a Stay. Respondents/real parties in interest have moved to expand the scope of this court's stay imposed on January 23, 2001, to prevent Stereoidogenesis Inhibitors International's annual meeting, scheduled for April 24, 2001, from going forward. We conclude that the issuance of a stay would be improper at this time, and we deny the motion. Nos. 37042/37160/37179/37180/37273. (01-05118) | | |
| 03/29/2001 | Motion | Filed Motion. (Law firm of Hutchison & Steffen). Nos. 37042/37160/37179/37180/37273 (01-05510) | | |
| 04/02/2001 | Notice/Outgoing | Letter. Thomas J. Tanksley. | | |
| 08/02/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. to withdraw as counsel of record for respondents and real parties in interest in these consolidated matters filed March 29, 2001. fn1[The motion states that Mr. Sapse has been the lead plaintiff/respondent in these matters and is the party who signed the Engagement Agreement with Hutchison & Steffen and has been responsible for payment of the firm's fees.] Hutchison & Steffen shall have 10 days from the date of this order to serve a copy of this order on all respondents/real parties in interest and file proof of such service with this court. Respondents shall have 30 days from the date of this order to either obtain new counsel and cause new counsel to file a notice of appearance with this order or inform this court in writing that they do not intend to retain new counsel. New counsel, if obtained, will be expected to participate in the settlement conference program to which this appeal is assigned. Nos. 37042/37160/37179/37180/37273. (01-13103) | | |
| 08/20/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. that the order filed on 8/2/01 was served on all respondents/real parties in interest on 8/13/01 by mail. Nos. 37042/37160/37179/37180/37273 (01-14113). | | |
| 10/25/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On August 2, 2001, we entered an order granting the law firm of Hutchison & Steffen's motion to withdraw as counsel for respondents and real party in interest in these consolidated matters. The order gave respondents/real party in interest thirty days to obtain new counsel. To date, respondents/real party in interest have failed to respond to our order. It appears that they do not intend to obtain counsel to represent them in these matters. We therefore, remove these matters from the settlement conference program. Appellants shall have 15 days from the date of this order to file a docketing statement in Docket Nos. 37042, 37160 and 37273. Upon the filing of the docketing statements, this court shall conduct a preliminary jurisdictional review of these appeals. fn1[We defer ruling on respondents' motion to dismiss in docket Nos. 37160 and 37273, pending completion of our jurisdictional review.] Nos. 37042/37160/37179/37180/37273. (01-17954) | | |
| 11/21/2001 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. (late, not on our form, no certificate of service) Nos. 37042/37160/37179/37180/37273. | | |
| 01/23/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. To date, appellants have failed to file a corrected docketing statement. Appellants shall file and serve the docketing statement in Docket Nos. 37042, 37160, and 37273 within 10 days from the date of this order or show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. fn1[The clerk of this court shall provide the law firm of Marquis & Aurbach, counsel for appellants/petitioners, a copy of the 'Proof of Service' filed on August 20, 2001, by respondent's former counsel.] (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellants in Docket Nos. 37042, 37160, and 37273). Nos. 37042/37160/37179/37180/37273. | | |
| 06/13/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. To date, appellants have failed to file a corrected docketing statement. Appellants in Docket Nos. 37042, 37160, and 37273 shall have 10 days from the date of this order to file a docketing statement accompanied by proof of service on all respondents. We waive the requirement that the docketing statement be on the form provided by the clerk of this court. When filing the docketing statement, appellants may use their own form as long as their form contains the identical information as the form provided by the clerk of this court. Failure to comply with this order in a timely manner may result in the imposition of sanctions. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) Nos. 37042/37160/37179/37180/37273. (02-10302) | | |
| 07/02/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Notice of Withdrawal of Appeal for case nos. 37042, 37160, and 37273. Nos. 37042/37160/37179/37180/37273. [02-11328] | | |
| 08/23/2002 | Order/Clerk's | Filed Clerk's Order. Cause appearing, appellant's motions for a voluntary dismissal of the appeals in Docket Nos. 37042, 37160, and 37273 are granted. "Those consolidated appeals are dismissed." fn1[In light of this order, respondents' December 22, 2000, motion to dismiss the appeal in Docket No. 37160, and January 12, 2001, motion to dismiss the appeal in Docket No. 37273 are denied as moot.] NRAP 42(b). The original writ proceedings in Docket Nos. 37179 and 37180, however, remain pending before this court. NNP/CLK. Nos. 37042/37160/37179/37180/37273. | | 02-14532
|
| 11/12/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. We direct petitioners to demonstrate, within 20 days from the date of this order, why these petitions should not be dismissed. We caution petitioners that failure to respond may result in the dismissals of these petitions. Nos. 37179/37180. (02-19413) | | |
| 11/25/2002 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Notice of Withdrawal of Petition for Extraordinary Relief. Nos. 37179/37180. (02-20222) | | |
| 12/16/2002 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Petition. Order Dismissing Petitions for a Writ of Prohibition and for a Writ of Mandamus. In response to our order directing petitioners to show cause why these petitions should not be dismissed as moot, petitioners acknowledge that these petitions are moot and have filed notices indicating that they desire to withdraw the petitions. We elect to treat the notices as motions to voluntarily dismiss the petitions, and we grant the motions. 'We dismiss these petitions.' SNP03-MS/ML/NB. Nos. 37179/37180. | | 02-21483
|
| 12/16/2002 | Case Status Update | Case Closed. No notice in lieu of remittitur issued. | | |