search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record


Case Information: 35801
Short Caption:KRIEG VS. GRAND VIEW APARTMENTSCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A377236Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:08/03/2000How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
03/17/2000Filing Fee Filing Fee due.
03/17/2000Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 00-04326
07/10/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Record due: 30 days. fn1--[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 00-11672
08/03/2000Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal. Volumes 1 through 3. Mailed on 08/01/00. 00-13488
08/03/2000Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
11/02/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. We conclude that the jury's verdict was supported by substantial evidence. " . . . we affirm the judgment of the district court." fn1[The district court granted appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on March 28, 2000, and accordingly no filing fee is due. Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant.] SNP00A-CY/WM/NB 00-19294
11/28/2000RemittiturIssued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal, Vols. 1 through 3 this day. 00-19632
11/28/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
11/28/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to proper person appellant Krieg. Letter seeking rehearing is being returned, unfiled, as untimely. 00-20793
01/11/2001RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on December 14, 2000. 00-19632
02/27/2001Other Returned Unfiled Document.
10/22/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. Denying Motion to recall remittitur. In the case at bar, the remittitur was regularly issued following an untimely petition for rehearing. Appellant has identified no inadvertence, fraud, imposition, false suggestion, misapprehension or mistake of fact in our decision affirming the district court's judgment. We deny appellant's motion to recall the remittitur and for leave to file an untimely petition for rehearing. fn10[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant.] 01-17725
10/23/2003Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order/Rehearing Denied. This proper person appeal from a judgment in a landlord-tenant dispute was affirmed in November 2000. In October 2001, we denied appellant's motion to recall the remittitur. On July 24, 2003, this court received appellant's letter-request to 're-open[]' this appeal because we have ordered new trials in unrelated criminal cases. We construe appellant's request as seeking rehearing of our order denying the remittitur's recall, and we deny the request as untimely. fn1[NRAP 40(a)(1) (stating that rehearing must be sought within eighteen days of this court's decision). We direct the clerk of this court to return, un-filed, appellant's letter. 03-17698
10/23/2003Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to appellant Harold Brian Krieg. Returned unfiled, the original proper person letter "Letter from proper person appellant Harold Krieg requesting that this case be re-opened."