| Case Information: 34352 | |||
| Short Caption: | PENGILLY VS. RANCHO SANTA FE HOMEOWNERS ASSN | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 33780 , 33968 , 34436 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A360332 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - General - Other |
| Disqualifications: | Young | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | En Banc | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 06/17/1999 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Lorber, Beddoe & Pengilly--check no. 01222. | ||
| 06/17/1999 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | 99-05254 | |
| 06/17/1999 | Other | Disqualification of Justice Young. Law firm of Lionel Sawyer & Collins. | ||
| 07/12/1999 | Motion | Filed Motion. Respondent's Brief to Pengilly's Appeal | 99-06216 | |
| 07/14/1999 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Permission to File Untimely Docketing Statement. | 99-06299 | |
| 07/21/1999 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Respondent's Opposition to Motion for Permission to file Untimely Docket Statement. | 99-06568 | |
| 07/23/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. A stay of the district court's order is already in place in Pengilly v. District Court Docket No. 33780. In light of the unusual procedural posture of these proceedings, we grant appellants' motion with respect to this appeal. Enforcement of the order sanctioning appellants is hereby stayed in district court Case No. A360332. Appellants shall have 30 days from the date of this order to submit points and authorities, limited to 15 pages, concerning whether an order of contempt is properly reviewed in the context of an appeal or must be challenged though a petition for extraordinary relief. Respondents shall then have 20 days from service of appellants' points and authorities to file responsive points and authorities, limited to 15 pages. fn1[Briefing and the ordering of transcripts in this matter shall be stayed pending further order of this court. We defer ruling on appellants' request for consolidation]. | 99-06701 | |
| 08/23/1999 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Appellants' Points and Authorities re: Proper Mode of Review, (Fed-Ex 8/20/99) | 99-07841 | |
| 09/07/1999 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Respondent's Brief re: Judicial Request for Supplemental points and authorities re; Method of Review. | 99-08396 | |
| 08/18/2000 | Opinion/Dispositional | Filed Per Curiam Opinion. "Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction." fn3[We note that appellants have already filed a petition for extroaordinary relief, and the merits of their challenge to the contempt order will be addressed in that proceeding. The Honorable Cliff Young, Justice, voluntarily recused himself from participation in the decision of this appeal.] Before the Court En Banc. Per Curiam. 116 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 75. En Banc. | 00-14507 | |
| 09/13/2000 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 00-14706 | |
| 09/13/2000 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 09/18/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. On August 18, 2000, this court entered an opinion in this appeal. We have not ruled, to date, on a motion filed by appellants on July 14, 1999, requesting permission to file an untimely docketing statement. The motion is granted and the clerk of this court is directed to file the docketing statement which was received on July 14, 1999. | 00-16353 | |
| 09/18/2000 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | 99-06300 | |
| 10/06/2000 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on October 2, 2000. | 00-14706 | |