judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

HARRIS VS. RIO HOTEL AND CASINO

Case Information: 32816
Short Caption:HARRIS VS. RIO HOTEL AND CASINOCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A385634Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:BeckerCase Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: En Banc
To SP/Judge:08/14/1998 / Turner, WilliamSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:02/09/2001 at 9:00 AMOral Argument Location:Carson City
Submission Date:02/09/2001How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
08/07/1998Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200. (McKnight & Hendrix-check no. 0003227).
08/07/1998Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.)
08/14/1998Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice. Notice of Settlement Conference. Settlement Judge: William C. Turner. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
08/17/1998Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request. Certificate of Non-Intent to Order Transcript for Appeal.
08/20/1998Other Other. Returned, unfiled, with letter: original and three copies of the Docketing Statement.
08/28/1998Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement.
09/28/1998Letter/IncomingReceived Letter. Copy of letter from Settlement Judge Turner to attorneys regarding conference date.
12/14/1998MotionFiled Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Appellant's Motion to Dismiss Appeal.
12/18/1998MotionFiled Response to Motion. Respondent's Opposition to Appellant's Motion to Dismiss Appeal.
02/10/1999Settlement Program Motion/StipulationFiled Settlement Program/Stipulated Dismissal. Settlement Conference Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter.
02/19/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Case Processing Order. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. The time deadlines for requesting and preparing transcripts and briefing shall remain suspended pending a jurisdictional review of this appeal and further order of this court.
03/09/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Case Processing Order. Denying Motion to Dismiss. Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal based on the assertion that the certification of finality was improper. Respondent opposes the motion. Having reviewed the motion and opposition, we conclude that the NRCP 54(b) certification was properly entered, and we deny appellant's motion to dismiss. fn1[We note that appellant has the option of voluntarily dismissing this appeal pursuant to NRAP 42. A voluntary dismissal of this appeal, which is from a certified final judgment, will preclude appellant from appealing from the summary judgment order in the future.]
04/15/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Case Processing Order. Appellant shall have 70 days from the date of this order to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1).
06/24/1999MotionFiled Motion and Order Extending Time. Appellant shall have to and including July 26, 1999, to file the Opening Brief.
07/27/1999BriefFiled Brief. Appellant's Opening Brief. (Mailed on: Fed-Ex 7/26/99).
07/27/1999AppendixFiled Appendix. Joint Appendix.
09/02/1999BriefFiled Brief. Respondent's Answering Brief. (Mailed on: 8/30/99).
10/06/1999BriefFiled Brief. Appellant's Reply Brief. (Mailed on: 10/4/99).
09/25/2000Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. Oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted for decision to the Southern Nevada Panel as of the date of this order on the briefs filed herein. SNP00A-RR/CY/WM. 00-16898
09/25/2000Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. Panel: SNP00A-RR/CY/WM.
12/18/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order Scheduling Oral Argument. This appeal was previously submitted on the briefs and record filed herein. We have subsequently determined, however, that oral argument would be of assistance in the disposition of this appeal. Accordingly, oral argument is hereby scheduled before the En Banc Court on February 9, 2001, at the hour of 9:00 a.m. in Carson City. The argument shall be limited to thirty (30) minutes. 00-22011
01/24/2001Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice.
02/09/2001Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. EN BANC-WM/CY/MS/DA/RR/ML
06/21/2001Opinion/DispositionalFiled Authored Opinion. "Affirmed." fn65[The Honorable Nancy A. Becker, Justice, did not participate in the decision of this matter.] Before the Court En Banc. By the Court, Maupin, C.J. We concur: Young, Shearing, Agosti, and Leavitt, JJ. Rose, J., concurring. 117 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 43. 01-10473
07/05/2001Other Other. Respondent's Bill of Costs. 01-11271
07/17/2001RemittiturIssued Remittitur. Memorandum of Cost and Disbursements allowed and taxed in the amount of $250.00. 01-10513
07/17/2001Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
07/26/2001RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on July 19, 2001. 01-10513