judyrecords
search tips
750 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

MARTIN VS. CITY OF RENO

Case Information: 30923
Short Caption:MARTIN VS. CITY OF RENOCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV9607275Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:08/27/1997 / Gladstone, ArthurSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:11/03/1998How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
08/22/1997Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $100.00 from James Andre Boles -- Check No. 1375
08/22/1997Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.)
08/27/1997Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Arthur Gladstone . (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
08/28/1997Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request.
08/28/1997Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement.
10/08/1997Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter.
11/05/1997Other Other. Filed Order appellant shall have 30 days from the date of this order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Failure to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction may result in this court's dismissal of this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Pending our resolution of the jurisdictional issue, the briefing schedule in this appeal shall remain suspended.
11/26/1997MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause.
05/21/1998Other Other. Filed Order on Novemeber 5, 1997, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant filed a response. We conclude that the district court's order necessarily resolved all of appellant's claims and constituted a final judgment within the meaning of NRAP 3A(b)(1). The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this appeal. Appellant shall have 70 days from the date of this order to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1).
07/31/1998BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: Reno/Carson Msgr. 7/31/98
07/31/1998AppendixFiled Joint Appendix.
08/31/1998BriefFiled Answering Brief. Mailed on: Reno/Carson Msgr.
08/31/1998AppendixFiled Appendix to Answering Brief.
09/30/1998BriefFiled Reply Brief. Mailed on: Reno/Carson Msgr. 09/30/98
11/03/1998Other Other. Filed Order oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted as of the date of this order, on the record and briefs filed herein.
11/03/1998Other Other. Case submitted on the record and briefs this day.
11/03/1998Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
07/07/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Appeal. "ORDER this appeal dismissed." NNP99B-CY/DA/ML 00-11558
08/01/2000RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 00-13272
08/01/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
08/08/2000RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on August 4, 2000. 00-13272