Case Information: 10-AA-1536 | |||
Short Caption: | ROGER GORDON V. DC ALCOHOL BEV. CONT. BD. | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Alcohol Beverage Control Board (ABC) |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | 10-251-220 | Filed Date: | 12/14/2010 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 12/14/2010 | Case Status: | Decided/Dismissed |
Record Completed: | 02/03/2011 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 08/09/2011 |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Petitioner | Roger Gordon | N | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
Respondent | D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
12/14/2010 | PETITION FOR REVIEW AND MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ********CONSTRUED AS A MOTION TO STAY LIFTING OF SUMMARY SUSPENSION LW | |||
12/14/2010 | FILING FEE of $100.00. | |||
12/14/2010 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD and Todd Kim, Esq. | |||
12/15/2010 | PETITIONER'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION | |||
12/15/2010 | TMC - PFR - motion for injunctive relief | |||
12/15/2010 | ORDERED that PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND TO STAY the lifting of the summary suspension IS DENIED on the merits. See Barry v. Washington Post Co., 529 A.2d 319, 321 (DC 1987). It is *****MORE***** | |||
12/15/2010 | FURTHER ORDERED that PETITIONER SHALL, w/n 20 days from the date of this order, SHOW CAUSE why his PFR should not be DISMISSED since petitioner lacks standing to appeal the respondent's decision since petitioner was neither a party nor particiapted in the proceedings before the Board. (FIOBFA) (rm) | |||
12/15/2010 | TMC - OTSC | |||
12/15/2010 | RECEIVED - District's opposition to motion for injunctive relief *******ALREADY DECIDED | |||
12/15/2010 | PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION | |||
12/16/2010 | RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION- to petitioner's motion for reconsideration | |||
12/16/2010 | ORDERED that PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED. (FIOB) (rm) | |||
02/03/2011 | RECORD ON APPEAL w/11/1/10 hearing | |||
02/03/2011 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
02/11/2011 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (JAC) | |||
03/23/2011 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF (no appendix) | |||
03/29/2011 | It appearing that the brief of petitioner was filed with this court on March 23, 2011, and it further appearing that the appendix was due to be filed on or before March 23, 2011 and has not been filed, (See D.C. App. R. 30, 31.), it is ORDERED that petitioner shall within 15 days from the date of this order submit the limited appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the app endix or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days from the date the appendix is filed with this court. (JAC) | |||
04/08/2011 | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDIX | |||
04/08/2011 | RECEIVED - Petitioner's appendix (Volumes I - II) | |||
04/27/2011 | On consideration of petitioner's motion for leave to file the lodged appendix, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted and the lodged appendix is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (JAC) | |||
04/27/2011 | APPENDIX | |||
05/04/2011 | On further consideration of this court's 12/15/10 order which directed petitioner to show cause... it is ORDERED that PETITIONER SHALL W/N 15 DAYS SHOW CAUSE why this petition should not be dismissed since petitioner lacks standing to appeal since he was neither a party nor did he participate in the proceedings before the Board...(BY: ETW) | |||
05/04/2011 | TMC - OTSC - respondent's motion to stay briefing - ROTSC | |||
05/12/2011 | RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until pending resolution of Court's 12/15/10 order to show cause (no oppo) | |||
05/19/2011 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE dated 5/4/11 | |||
07/18/2011 | Filed | Dismissed | ||
08/09/2011 | Filed | Mandate |