Case Information: 33495 | |||
Short Caption: | ROGERS VS. 8TH JUD DIST CT C/W 32528 | Court: | Supreme Court |
Consolidated: | 32528 *, 33495 | Related Case(s): | 32528 |
Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A384787 | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus |
Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Case Closed | |
Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
Oral Argument: | 05/09/2000 at 11:00 AM | Oral Argument Location: | Las Vegas Office |
Submission Date: | 05/09/2000 | How Submitted: | After Oral Argument |
+ Party Information |
Docket Entries | ||||
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
12/18/1998 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Woods & Erickson-check no. 6595. | ||
12/18/1998 | Petition/Writ | Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Petition for Writ of Mandamus or other Extraordinar Relief. | 98-00439 | |
01/22/1999 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion to Strike Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Other Extraordinary Relief. | 99-00444 | |
01/29/1999 | Motion | Filed Stipulation. Stipulation Extending Time (opposition to motion to strike) | 99-00659 | |
02/03/1999 | Order/Clerk's | Filed Clerk's Order Approving Stipulation. Petitioners shall have 5 days from the date of this order to file an opposition to the January 22, 1999 motion to strike the petition. | 99-00742 | |
02/05/1999 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion to Strike Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Other Extraordinary Writ. | 99-00826 | |
03/03/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Answer Writ Petition. Answer due: 20 days from the date of this order. fn1[We deny the motion to strike, without prejudice to real parties' in interest ability to raise the same arguments in their answer.] | 99-01503 | |
03/25/1999 | Petition/Writ | Filed Answer to Petition for Writ. Answer of Real Parties in Interest, Werner, et al., to Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Other Extraordinary Relief. | 99-02165 | |
01/27/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Consolidation. We conclude that in the interest of judicial economy these matters should be consolidated. We hereby consolidate the above-entitled matters. Nos. 32528, 33495. | 00-01340 | |
03/27/2000 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for May 9, 2000 at the hour of 11:00 a.m. for 1/2 hour in Las Vegas.(Nos. 32528 and 33495) (SNP99B-WM/MS/NB) | 00-05005 | |
04/24/2000 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Oral Argument Reminder Notice. | 00-06421 | |
05/09/2000 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. Before the Southern Nevada Panel. SNP99B-WM/MS/NB Nos. 32528, 33495. | ||
08/10/2000 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order Reversing District Court Order and Denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus. " . . . we reverse the order of the district court and remand this matter to the district court with instructions to reinstate the decision of the Board approving an R-2 PUD zoning change." fn1[In light of this disposition, the petitioners' petition for a writ of mandamus is denied as moot.] SNP99B-WM/MS/NB. Nos. 32528, 33495. Document No. 00-13949. | ||
08/30/2000 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Petition for Rehearing. Respondents' Petition for Rehearing (nos. 33495/32525). Received L.V. drop box 8/28/00. | 00-15235 | |
08/30/2000 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $100 from Harrision firm-check no. 19740 (nos. 33495/32528). | ||
03/07/2001 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." SNP99B-WM/MS/NB Nos. 32528/33495 | 01-04110 | |
03/21/2001 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Petition for En Banc Reconsideration. Mailed on: March 19, 2001. LV Dropbox. Nos. 32528/33495 (01-04961) | ||
03/23/2001 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | 01-04166 | |
03/23/2001 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
05/08/2001 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order Denying En Banc Reconsideration. Denying Petition for En Banc Reconsideration. We have reviewed the petition, and we conclude that en banc reconsideration is not warranted. " . . . we deny the petition." EN BANC-WM/CY/MS/DA/RR/ML/NB. Nos. 32528/33495 (01-07668) |