| Case Information: 10-AA-1499 | |||
| Short Caption: | TSAKNIS DENTAL GROUP V. SHAMEEKA PANNELL | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | DOES01955-10 | Filed Date: | 12/03/2010 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 12/03/2010 | Case Status: | Decided/Dismissed |
| Record Completed: | 01/25/2011 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
| Briefs Completed: | 05/20/2011 | ||
| Argued/Submitted: | 12/15/2011 | ||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 02/24/2012 | ||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Petitioner | Tsaknis Dental Group | N |
| ||||||
| Respondent | Shameeka Pannell | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 12/03/2010 | PETITION FOR REVIEW | |||
| 12/03/2010 | FILING FEE of $100.00. | |||
| 12/07/2010 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD, OAH and Michael A. Milwee, Esq. | |||
| 12/15/2010 | On consideration of the petition for review in this matter, and it appearing that Tsaknis Dental Group is a business that must be represented by counsel, it is ORDERED that petitioner shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (A)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. (JAC) | |||
| 12/28/2010 | APPEARANCE- of Jeffrey M. Hamberger on behalf of petitioner | |||
| 01/25/2011 | RECORD ON APPEAL w/transcript | |||
| 01/25/2011 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
| 01/28/2011 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (JAC) | |||
| 03/08/2011 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF (no appendix) | |||
| 03/18/2011 | It appearing that the brief of petitioner, was filed with this court on March 8, 2011, and it further appearing that the appendix was due to be filed on or before March 9, 2011, and has not been filed, (See D.C. App. R. 30, 31.), it is ORDERED that petitioner shall within 15 days from the date of this order submit the appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the appendix or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of respondent shall be filed within 30 days from the date the appendix is filed with this court. (JAC) | |||
| 03/31/2011 | RECEIVED - aplt's appdx (will mail the motion to file late) | |||
| 04/04/2011 | RECEIVED: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDIX (Did not comply w/rule 27) | |||
| 04/12/2011 | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDIX (amended) which includes Rule 27 | |||
| 04/22/2011 | On consideration of petitioner's motion for leave to file the lodged appendix, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted and the lodged appendix is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (JAC) | |||
| 04/22/2011 | APPENDIX | |||
| 05/20/2011 | RESPONDENT'S BRIEF | |||
| 05/20/2011 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
| 06/09/2011 | Filed | Final Screening-Summary | ||
| 06/15/2011 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO STRIKE - respondent's filing and written document attached thereto | |||
| 06/21/2011 | Filed | TMC/motion to strike respondent's brief/OPPO/LODGED REPLY/LODED SUR REPLY | ||
| 06/24/2011 | RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION to motion to strike. | |||
| 10/17/2011 | Filed | Order Sua Sponte, THAT THE CLERK SHALL FILE THE LODGED REPLY and SUR-REPLY... | ||
| 10/17/2011 | Filed | PETITIONER'S REPLY to Resp oppo to motion to mot to strike. | ||
| 10/17/2011 | Filed | Reply to Petitioner's Reply to Appellee's Opposition to Petitioner's Motion To Strike. (Respondent) | ||
| 10/17/2011 | Filed | Order Denying RESPONDENT'S REQUEST FOR MONETARY AWARD, GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO STRIKE RESPONDENT'S BRIEF TO THE EXTENT and... | ||
| 11/03/2011 | Filed | ACTION - Calendar notice sent | ||
| 12/15/2011 | Filed | Submitted to Chief Judge Washington, Judges Blackburne-Rigsby, Nebeker | ||
| 01/31/2012 | Filed | Affirmed (MOJ) (Washington, Chief Judge, Blackburne-Rigsby, Associate Judge, and Nebeker, Senior Judge.) | ||
| 02/24/2012 | Filed | Mandate | ||