CURTIS VS. AMES

Case Information: 34880
Short Caption:	CURTIS VS. AMES	Court:	Supreme Court
		Related Case(s):	35820 , 38345 , 41621
Lower Court Case(s):	Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A312219	Classification:	Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:		Case Status:	Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:		Panel Assigned:	Panel
To SP/Judge:		SP Status:
Oral Argument:		Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:	01/19/2000	How Submitted:	On Record

Party Information
Role	Party Name	Represented By
Appellant	David W. Curtis	In Proper Person
Respondent	Al McCourt	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Barbara Miller	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Carl Manthei	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Christian Hansen	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Chun Hua Chiu	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Cindy Yocum	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Conita Opp Jones	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Daniel Koch, Jr.	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Daniel Koch, Sr.	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Daniel Sharpe	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	David Ernst	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Donald Kleitzien, Jr.	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Elizabeth Lyn Donley	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Elkhorn "40"	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Frances Lombardo	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Gerard Lombardo	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Glen Shaefer	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Helen Ross	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Herbert Hansen	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Howard Greenspon	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Hsui-Yeh Chan	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Hui Wen Kao	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Ila Perry	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Jennifer Avena, M.D.	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Jiunn-Nan Ho	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	John Barton	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	John Lombardo	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	John Yacks	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Joseph Caperonis	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Judy Shaefer	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Karen Wilkes	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Karlene Lee	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Ken Cohen	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Kenneth Land	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Kevin Morley	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Lenore Cohen	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Margaret Barton	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Maria McCourt	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Marion Caperonis	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Marisa Chang	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Mary Kathryn Rubino	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Mell Slade	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Michael Cadile	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Michael Miller	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Michael Stanczyk	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Pamela Hollister	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Patrick Lee	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	R & D Investments, Ltd.	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Ricki Greenspon	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Rosalie Ashness Kleitzien	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Roy Hollister	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Sharlene Yacks	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Sharon Stanczyk	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Stanley Ames, M.D.	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Stephen Avena, D.D.S.	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Stephen Perry	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Tom Jones	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Truman Stromberg	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Victor Hill	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Vincent Lombardo	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Virgil Slade	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)
Respondent	Wing T Investments	James R. Christensen (Brenske & Christensen)

Docket Entries
Date	Type	Description	Pending?	Document
09/24/1999	Filing Fee	Filing Fee due.
09/24/1999	Notice of Appeal Documents	Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day.		99-09130
09/24/1999	Notice/Outgoing	Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days
11/18/1999	Filing Fee	Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from David W. Curtis--check no. 6314010454.
12/27/1999	Order/Procedural	Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn1--[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.]		99-13177
01/14/2000	Motion	Filed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.		00-00661
01/19/2000	Record on Appeal Documents	Filed Record on Appeal. Volumes 1 through 23. Mailed on 01/12/00.		00-00861
01/19/2000	Case Status Update	Submitted for Decision.
10/19/2000	Order/Procedural	Filed Order/Show Cause. This is a proper person appeal from an order entered by the district court following a bench trial. fn1[We grant Curtis' motion for leave to appear in proper person for the limited purpose of filing a docketing statement and a response to this order. We note that as Curtis is in proper person, no docketing statement was due from him; accordingly, his motion of September 19, 2000, for leave to file a late docketing statement is denied on this basis. We direct the clerk to file the docketing statement submitted by Curtis on September 26, 2000. No other documents submitted by Curtis in proper person shall be filed absent further order of this court. We defer ruling on all other pending motions at this time.] Curtis shall have 30 days from the date of this order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We caution Curtis that failure to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction may result in this court's dismissal of this appeal.		00-18585
10/19/2000	Other Incoming Document	Filed Proper Person Document. Proper Person Docketing Statement.		00-16996
01/03/2001	Order/Dispositional	Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. "ORDER this appeal dismissed." fn1[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant. We deny the relief requested therein as moot in light of this order. In addition, respondents' motion to dismiss this appeal, filed on January 14, 1999, is denied as moot.] NNP00A-MS/DA/ML		01-00166
01/30/2001	Remittitur	Issued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal, Vols. 1 through 23 this day.		01-00638
01/30/2001	Case Status Update	Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
03/13/2001	Remittitur	Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on February 6, 2001.		01-00638