Case Information: 34880 | |||
Short Caption: | CURTIS VS. AMES | Court: | Supreme Court |
Related Case(s): | 35820 , 38345 , 41621 | ||
Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A312219 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person |
Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
Submission Date: | 01/19/2000 | How Submitted: | On Record |
+ Party Information |
Docket Entries | ||||
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
09/24/1999 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | ||
09/24/1999 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 99-09130 | |
09/24/1999 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days | ||
11/18/1999 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from David W. Curtis--check no. 6314010454. | ||
12/27/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn1--[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] | 99-13177 | |
01/14/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. | 00-00661 | |
01/19/2000 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal. Volumes 1 through 23. Mailed on 01/12/00. | 00-00861 | |
01/19/2000 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
10/19/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. This is a proper person appeal from an order entered by the district court following a bench trial. fn1[We grant Curtis' motion for leave to appear in proper person for the limited purpose of filing a docketing statement and a response to this order. We note that as Curtis is in proper person, no docketing statement was due from him; accordingly, his motion of September 19, 2000, for leave to file a late docketing statement is denied on this basis. We direct the clerk to file the docketing statement submitted by Curtis on September 26, 2000. No other documents submitted by Curtis in proper person shall be filed absent further order of this court. We defer ruling on all other pending motions at this time.] Curtis shall have 30 days from the date of this order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We caution Curtis that failure to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction may result in this court's dismissal of this appeal. | 00-18585 | |
10/19/2000 | Other Incoming Document | Filed Proper Person Document. Proper Person Docketing Statement. | 00-16996 | |
01/03/2001 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. "ORDER this appeal dismissed." fn1[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant. We deny the relief requested therein as moot in light of this order. In addition, respondents' motion to dismiss this appeal, filed on January 14, 1999, is denied as moot.] NNP00A-MS/DA/ML | 01-00166 | |
01/30/2001 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal, Vols. 1 through 23 this day. | 01-00638 | |
01/30/2001 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
03/13/2001 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on February 6, 2001. | 01-00638 |