| Case Information: 10-CT-1410 | |||
| Short Caption: | DDX J. OBUSZEWSKI V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | Classification: | Appeals - Criminal - DC - DC Non-Traffic |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CDC26093-06 | Filed Date: | 11/05/2010 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 11/05/2010 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 02/02/2011 | ||
| Costs Waived | |||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Appellant | Max J. Obuszewski | Y | |||||||
| Appellee | District of Columbia | N |
| ||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 11/05/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 11/24/2010 | ORDERED that APPELLANT shall W/N 20 DAYS from the date of this order, SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed EITHER as having been IMPROPERLY FILED OR DISMISSED as appellant is NOT AGGRIEVED by the October 7, 2010 order, since the Contempt charge against him has been dismissed. (BY: ETW) | |||
| 11/24/2010 | TMC - OTSC | |||
| 01/11/2011 | On consideration of this court 11/24/10 order directing appellant to show cause why this appeal from the 10/7/10 finding of contempt should not be dismissed having been improperly filed since the NOA IS UNSIGNED, NO RESPONSE HAVING BEEN FILED and it appearing that appellant has not corrected promptly the NOA by signing it, it is ORDERED that the NOA IS STRICKEN AND DISMISSED as having been IMPROPERLY FILED. See DC App. R. 4 (c)(2). (RZTEFA) (rl) | |||
| 01/11/2011 | STRICKEN & DISMISSED | |||
| 02/02/2011 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||