judyrecords
search tips
750 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

AUNDREY D. BURNO V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 99-CF-0967
Short Caption:AUNDREY D. BURNO V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Felony - Homicide
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:F520-96Filed Date:07/02/1999

Opening Event Date:07/02/1999Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:04/05/2000Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:04/27/2001
Argued/Submitted:12/04/2001
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:01/04/2002
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantAundrey D. Burno YPro SeN
AppelleeUnited StatesN
John R. Fisher NN
Bernard J. Delia YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
07/02/1999NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by: Robert D. Scott 202 543-7800 425-749
08/23/1999APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Frazer Walton, Jr., Esquire
09/10/1999SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (10-pgs/hunt 4/1/99 proc.)
09/14/1999RECORD ON APPEAL
10/06/1999ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the docketing statement out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the docketing statement or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this court may result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (By: GP)
11/18/1999ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the docketing statement out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the docketing statement or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this courtshallresult in counsel's appointment being vacated. (By: GP)
12/03/1999SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (336-pgs/rust 3/15-19/99 proc.)
12/08/1999APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS
12/08/1999RECEIVED - aplt's docketing statement (vvd)
12/17/1999SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #3 (411 pgs/Griffith) 3/29/99 & 3/31/99 proc.
12/29/1999ORDER GRANTING APLT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS, and the lodged docketing statement is filed. (BY: GPJ)
12/29/1999APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT (RT ordered)
02/08/2000SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #4 (20 pgs./Herzeld) 06/23/99 proc.
04/05/2000SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #5 (580-pgs/graybill 3/22-25/99 proc.)
04/05/2000RECORD COMPLETED
05/19/2000 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the brief_ of appellant_ shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief_ of appellee_ shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By: GP)
06/27/2000APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no ppo 60 days
07/12/2000 On consideration of the motion of appellant_ for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and no opposition having been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the brief of appellant shall be filed on or before August 28, 2000. (By: GP)
08/28/2000COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS Denied Without Prejudice
10/24/2000ORD DNY COUNSEL MO TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONwithout prejudice to the filing of an appropriate Anders motion pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) (AMW)
11/03/2000RECEIVED - ltr from aplt requesting new counsel.
11/03/2000SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD # 6 (16 pgs--Taped) (3/11/99 proc.)
11/08/2000COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS (renewed) Granted
11/17/2000TMC - Motion to withdraw as counsel (renewed)
11/27/2000ORD GRT COUNSEL MO TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASON and the appointment of Frazer Walton, Esquire, is hereby vacated, and Brandford P. Johnson Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant herein. Frazer Walton, Esquire, shall transmit all documents pertaining to this appeal to newly-appointed counsel forthwith. F/O that counsel for appellant shall, within 30 days from the date of this order file a supplemental brief or a statement that a supplemental brief will not be filed. (by: RDWSNM)
11/27/2000APPELLANT'S BRIEF (Walton Frazer, jr., Esquire)
11/30/2000APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Bradford P. Johnson, Esquire
12/29/2000APLT MOTION TO EXT TIME TO FILE SUPLEMENTAL BRIEF to 2/2/01 no oppo (vvd)
01/11/2001 On consideration of the motion of appellant_ for an extension of time within which to file the supplemental brief, and no opposition having been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion of appellant_ is granted, and the supplemental brief of appellant_ shall be filed with this court on or before February 2, 2001. (GP)
02/15/2001NOTICE RECEIVED - that aplt will not be filing a supp brief.
02/26/2001 On consideration of the notice of appellant to the court, wherein counsel for appellant states that a supplemental brief will not be filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of appellee_ shall be filed, within 30 days from the date of this order. (GP)
03/28/2001APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 4/27/01. no oppo
04/02/2001RECEIVED pro se letter from appellant regarding lack of communication between court-appointed counsel and appellant.
04/10/2001LETTER referring to counsel for appellant the April 2 pro se letter from appellant and directing counsel to respond within 20 days. (JAC)
04/12/2001 On consideration of the motion of appellee_ for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and no opposition having been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the brief of appellee_ shall be filed on or before April 27, 2001.__ (GP)
04/27/2001APPELLEE'S BRIEF
04/27/2001BRIEFS COMPLETED
05/02/2001LETTER - from aplt's attorney in response to court's letter dated 4/10/01. letting court know that he's been in mail contact with client
05/14/2001RECEIVED pro se letter from appellant regarding lack of response from court-appointed counsel.
05/17/2001LETTER referring to counsel for appellant the May 14 pro se letter from appellant. (JAC)
05/29/2001RECEIVED letter from appellant requesting new counsel.
06/11/2001LETTER referring to counsel for appellant the May 29 pro se letter from appellant. (JAC)
06/12/2001RECEIVED pro se letter from appellant regarding replacement of court-appointed counsel.
06/14/2001RECEIVED pro se letter from appellant regarding not having court-appointed counsel file any further pleadings on appellant's behalf.
06/27/2001LETTER referring to counsel for appellant the June 12 and 14 pro se letters from appellant. (JAC)
07/09/2001APLE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD no oppo with video tape attached
07/17/2001 On consideration of the unopposed motion of appellee to supplement the record, it is ORDERED that the motion of appellee___ is granted, and the Clerk of the Superior Court shall prepare and transmit the item(s) specified in appellee's_ motion to this court as a supplemental record forthwith. (GP)
07/31/2001SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #7 (Videotape confession of 1/16/96 and transcript of videotape confession pp1-25
09/26/2001FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
10/02/2001LETTER TO COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
11/02/2001CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
11/28/2001LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
12/04/2001FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
12/04/2001ARGUED (FA,RZ,RD) Bradford P. Johnson, Esq., for appellant. Bernard J. Delia, Esq., for appellee.
12/13/2001AFFIRMED moj (FA,RU,RD)
12/27/2001CJA ATTORNEY'S QUALLS LETTER
01/04/2002MANDATE ISSUED
04/01/2002RECEIVED pro se letter from appellant.
04/03/2002LETTER to appellant in response to his letter of April 1 and forwarding him a copy of the brief. (JAC)
04/17/2002LETTER- from aplt (Burno) re: attorney on appeal
06/06/2002APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to extend time to file motion to recall the mandate.
06/19/2002On consideration of appellant's pro se motion for an extension of time to file a motion to recall the mandate, and it appearing that the mandate issued in this matter on January 4, 2002, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that appellant may file a motion to recall the mandate within 60 days from the dadte of this order. See D.C. App.R.41(c). (FA,RZ,RD)
07/31/2002LETTER to appellant in response to his letter regarding the status of case. (JAC)
08/27/2002MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE Denied
01/21/2003On consideration of appellant's pro se motion for recall of mandate, it is ORDERED that the motion is denied. (FA,RZ,RD)
12/09/2003LETTER from appellant regarding his case.
12/10/2003LETTER to appellant in response to his letter of Dec. 9. (JAC)