Case Information: 10-CV-1387 | |||
Short Caption: | JULIE FEW V. ROGER RICHMOND | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Landlord And Tenant |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | LTB2737-10 | Filed Date: | 11/01/2010 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 11/01/2010 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 01/03/2011 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 04/01/2011 | ||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | |||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer |
Appellant | Julie Few | Y | Pro Se | N | |
Appellee | Roger Richmond | N | Pro Se | N |
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
11/01/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
11/18/2010 | On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on November 1, 2010, and it appearing that appellant was granted in forma pauperis status in the trial court, and it further appearing that transcript may be needed for this appeal, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 10 calendar days from the date of this order, file with the Court Reporting Division a motion for preparation of transcripts of proceedings in the Superior Court, with notice to appellee(s), for determination in accordance with Hancock v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 472 A.2d 867 (D.C. 1984). See D.C. App. R. 10(b)(5)(A). The Court Reporting Division will submit the motion to the appropriate judge for a decision as to whether transcripts will be provided at no cost. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall simultaneously submit a file-stamped copy of that motion with this court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (JAC) elp | |||
11/22/2010 | RECEIVED Appellant's Motion for Appeal Transcript. (RT-NEEDED/RT-REQUESTED for 10/19/10 & 10/20/10) (elp) | |||
01/03/2011 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (83-pgs/tape 10/19/10 proc.) | |||
01/03/2011 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#2 (25-pgs/tape 10/20/10 proc.)w/cd | |||
01/03/2011 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
01/06/2011 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (JAC) elp | |||
01/06/2011 | RECORD INDEX | |||
01/06/2011 | RECORD COPIES | |||
02/17/2011 | On consideration of this court's order of January 6, 2011, directing appellant to file the brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days and it appearing that the brief and the limited appendix have not been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the brief of appellant and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (JAC) elp | |||
03/11/2011 | On consideration of this court's order of February 17, 2011, directing appellant to submit the brief and the limited appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time, and it appearing that appellant has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this appeal is hereby dismissed.(ETW) elp | |||
03/11/2011 | DISMISSED | |||
04/01/2011 | MANDATE ISSUED |