Case Information: 36454 | |||
Short Caption: | ANDERSON VS. TEETER | Court: | Supreme Court |
Lower Court Case(s): | Carson City - First Judicial District - 0000255A | Classification: | Civil Appeal - General - Other |
Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Disposition Filed/Case Closed | |
Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
To SP/Judge: | 07/31/2000 / Olsen, Philip | SP Status: | Completed |
Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
+ Party Information |
Docket Entries | ||||
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
07/19/2000 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Brooke & Shaw--check no. 13402. | ||
07/19/2000 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 00-12501 | |
07/20/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion for Stay. Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal. | 00-12578 | |
07/20/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. Cause appearing, we hereby grant appellants a temporary stay of all proceedings below pending receipt and consideration of respondents' opposition to the motion for an injunction and pending further order of this court. | 00-12588 | |
07/31/2000 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Philip A. Olsen. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts and docketing statement suspended pending further order of this court.) | ||
07/31/2000 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion for Injunctive Relief Pending Appeal. | 00-13194 | |
08/03/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion for Order to Show Cause re: Contempt. | 00-13437 | |
08/03/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion for Permission to File Document. to Motion for Injunction. | 00-13438 | |
08/09/2000 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition to Appellants' Motion to Show Cause re: Contempt. | 00-13852 | |
08/10/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion for Permission to File Document. Motion for Leave to File Reply to [opposition to] Motion to Show Cause re Contempt. | 00-13913 | |
08/31/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. Order Denying Motion for Order to Show Cause. On August 3, 2000, appellants filed a motion for an order to show cause why respondents should not be held in contempt for violating our July 20, 2000, stay order. Having considered the submissions from both parties, we conclude that respondents' rescheduling of the foreclosure sale, without more, did not violate our stay order. We deny appellants' motion for an order to show cause. fn1[In light of our order, we deny as moot appellants' motion to file a reply to respondents' opposition to the motion for an order to show cause.] In addition, appellants filed a motion for leave to file a reply to respondents' opposition to the motion for stay. Appellants' motion is granted. The clerk of this court is directed to file appellants' reply, which was received on August 3, 2000. | 00-15350 | |
08/31/2000 | Motion | Filed Reply to Response. Reply to Opposition to Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal. | 00-13439 | |
08/31/2000 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Letter. to attorney Matuska: returned unfiled, the original Reply to Opposition to Motion for Order to Show Cause Re: Contempt, received August 10, 2000. | ||
09/14/2000 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties have agreed to a settlement of this matter. | 00-16224 | |
09/14/2000 | Settlement Program Motion/Stipulation | Filed Settlement Program/Stipulated Dismissal. | 00-16225 | |
10/18/2000 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Stipulated Dismissal. Pursuant to the settlement conference held in this matter and the stipulation of the parties, " . . . this appeal is dismissed." The parties shall bear their own costs. fn1[Appellant's July 20, 2000 motion for injunction pending appeal is denied as moot.] NNP/CLK | 00-18439 | |
10/18/2000 | Case Status Update | Case Closed. No remittitur issued. |