| Case Information: 11-AA-0306 | |||
| Short Caption: | CATENA OFFURUM V. D.C. DEP'T OF PUBLIC WORKS | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - OAH - Public Works |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | OAHPWK0001452-09 | Filed Date: | 03/11/2011 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 03/11/2011 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 06/10/2011 | ||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Petitioner | Catena Offurum | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
| Respondent | D.C. Department of Public Works | N |
| ||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 03/11/2011 | PETITION FOR REVIEW | |||
| 03/11/2011 | FILING FEE of $100.00. | |||
| 03/11/2011 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD, OAH and Todd, Kim, Esq. | |||
| 03/21/2011 | ORDERED that CATENA OFURUM shall W/N 20 DAYS from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed EITHER for LACK OF JURISDICTION since she was not a party below and since she is not an attorney she cannot file an appeal on another person's behalf,...OR as having been taken from a NON-APPEALABLE ORDER since a motion for reconsideration is not independently appealable... (BY: ETW) | |||
| 03/21/2011 | TMC - OTSC - ROTSC | |||
| 04/11/2011 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE | |||
| 05/05/2011 | ORDERED that this PETITION IS DISMISSED as Ms. Offurum lacks standing since she was not a party to the proceeding below...SEE HARDCOPY It is FURTHER ORDERED that the PETITION IS DENIED to the extent it seeks review of a motion for reconsideration... (THKNTE) | |||
| 05/05/2011 | DISMISSED | |||
| 06/10/2011 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||