| Case Information: 10-AA-1575 | |||
| Short Caption: | CELESTE FOREMAN V. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Other agency |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | Filed Date: | 12/22/2010 | |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 12/22/2010 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 03/07/2011 | ||
| Costs Waived | |||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Petitioner | Celeste Foreman | Y | Pro Se | N | |||||
| Respondent | D.C. Metropolitan Police Department | N |
| ||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 12/22/2010 | PETITION FOR REVIEW - NUNC PRO TUNC | |||
| 12/22/2010 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |||
| 01/05/2011 | ORDERED that PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IFP IS GRANTED and the Clerk shall file the LODGED PFR, NPT to December 22, 2010. It is *****MORE***** | |||
| 01/05/2011 | FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall, w/n 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction since the decision attached to the petition does not appear to be from a contested case. See DC Code 2-510 (2001). (BY: ETW) | |||
| 01/05/2011 | TMC - OTSC - ROTSC | |||
| 01/25/2011 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - dated 1/5/11 | |||
| 02/10/2011 | ORDERED that the PFR IS DISMISSED for lack jurisdiction as this court has jurisdiction to her only contested case agency appeals...SEE HARDCOPY ****MORE***** | |||
| 02/10/2011 | DISMISSED | |||
| 03/07/2011 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||