LEE A. CLARKE-BEY V. MARGARET QUICK

Case Information: 96-SP-1566
Short Caption:	LEE A. CLARKE-BEY V. MARGARET QUICK	Classification:	Appeals - Special Proceedings - Denial - Writ Of Habeas Corpus
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:	SP1115-96	Filed Date:	09/25/1996
Opening Event Date:	09/25/1996	Case Status:	Closed
Record Completed:	12/20/1996	Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:		Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:	09/02/1997
		Costs Waived

Events
Event Date	Status	Description	Result
09/25/1996		NOTICE OF APPEAL
12/20/1996		RECORD ON APPEAL
12/20/1996		RECORD COMPLETED
01/14/1997		ORDER: Appellant shall, within 30 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the docketing statement out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the docketing statement or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal. See D.C. App. R. 14. (By: GP)
01/14/1997		ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed wit hin 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days th ereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. Any request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By: GP)
02/14/1997		APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL or in the alternative for extension
03/04/1997		ORDER GRANTING APLT MO FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, and Matthew C. Leefer, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant herein. FO that appellant shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement. FO that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. Any request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By: AMW)
03/04/1997		APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Matthew C. Leefer, Esq.
03/14/1997		APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT (No RT ordered)
04/15/1997		APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until May 19, 1997. (unopposed)
05/05/1997		ORDERED that the unopposed motion is granted, and the brief of appellant shall be filed on or before May 19, 1997. Any furhter request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (BY: JAC)
05/19/1997		APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF- for 10 addititonal days no oppo
05/29/1997		COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW (ANDERS)	Granted
06/06/1997		ORDERED that the appellant shall file by June 23, 1997, any response showing cause why counsel's motion should not be granted, the appeal dismissed, and the judgment from which the appeal was taken affirmed. Failure to respond shall result in the motion being submitted for decision on the motion being submitted for decision on the motion and record alone. It is F/O that the motion of appellant for an extension of time within which to file the brief is hereby held in abeyance pending appellant's response to this order. (BY: AMW)
06/06/1997		In the Above case, your court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw from this appeal. If you wish, you may file a response to your attorney's motion by the date set forth in the attached order. In your response, you should set out your reasons why your attorney should not be permitted to withdraw. You may also set forth any grounds for appeal you believe you may have. In the event you need additional time within which to respond, you must advise the court in writing using the self addressed stamped envelope provided. After your response has been received or the time for filing has expired, the motion and any response you may make will be submitted to the court for its consideration. The court will also review the record of the trial proceedings including the court reporter's transcript. If the court concludes the appeal lacks merit and grants the motion of your court-appointed counsel to withdraw, the appeal may be dismissed. Therefore, it is important that you file a response to the motion if your believe there are grounds for appeal. (By: GPJ)
06/18/1997		APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to court's order of 6/6/97.
06/19/1997		TMC - Aplt's motion to extend time to file brief - Aplt's motion to withdraw as counsel (ANDERS) - Aplt's (pro se) response
08/08/1997		JUDGMENT GRANT COUNSEL MOTION TO WITHDRAW (ANDERS) It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order on appeal be, and hereby is, affirmed. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). *** MORE ***
08/08/1997		ORD DENY APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF AS MOOT. (by: TERDGA)
08/08/1997		AFFIRMED
09/02/1997		MANDATE ISSUED