Events |
Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
05/20/1998 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
08/14/1998 | | ORDERED: appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, tender the $50 docketing fee and file the docketing statement with this court, and file the designation of record and statement regarding transcript with the Superior Court, Office of Appeals Coordinator, Room 3148. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall simultaneously file a copy of those documents with this court, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time, and this court's $10 motion fee. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 14. (By: GP) | |
09/04/1998 | | NOTICE RECEIVED from aplt re related case | |
09/17/1998 | | ORDER: This appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 14. (By: AMW) | |
09/17/1998 | | DISMISSED | |
10/09/1998 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
10/27/1998 | | ORDER DENYING APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for modification or supplementation of the record. FO that this court will issue a briefing schedule in appeal no. 98CV782 upon the filing of the appellate record. (By: AMW) | |
10/27/1998 | | ORDER DENYING APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to consolidate appeals nos. 98CV782 and 98CV795. (More) | |
11/24/1998 | | ORDER: Appellant shall, in appeal no. 98CV795, within 10 days from the date of this order, tender the $50 docketing fee and file the docketing statement with this court, and file the designation of record and statement regarding transcript with the Superior Court, Office of Appeals Coordinator, Room 3148. FO that appellant shall simultaneously file a copy of those documents with this court, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time, and this court's $10 motion fee. The motoin should set forth good cause for the failure to either timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall result in appellant's motion to reconsider the dismissal of appeal no. 98CV795 being denied. See D.C. App. R. 14. FO that the motion of appellant for reconsideration of this court's dismissal order of September 17, 1998, is hereby held in abeyance pending appellant's compliance with this order. (motion contains request to consolidate 98CV782 and 98CV795) (By: AMW) | |
12/09/1998 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to filed documents late for 98 cv795 | |
12/09/1998 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
12/09/1998 | | $50.00 DOCKETING FEE | |
12/09/1998 | | RECEIVED - aplt's docketing statement | |
12/09/1998 | | RECEIVED - designation of record | |
12/09/1998 | | RECEIVED -statement regarding transcripts | |
12/29/1998 | | ORDER GRANT APPELLANT MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION of this court's dismissal order of September 17, 1998, in appeal no. 98CV795, and appeal no. 98CV795 is hereby reinstated. FO that the mandate issued in appeal no. 98CV795 is hereby recalled. (More) | |
12/29/1998 | | ORDER SUA SPONTE REINSTATING APPEAL (per motion). | |
12/29/1998 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file documents out of time in appeal no. 98CV795, and the Clerk shall file the lodged docketing statement, designation of record and statement regarding transcript. (By: AMW) | |
12/29/1998 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT in 98CV795 | |
12/29/1998 | | DESIGNATION OF RECORD in 98CV795 | |
12/29/1998 | | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) in 98CV795 | |
12/29/1998 | | MANDATE RECALLED in appeal no. 98CV795 | |
03/15/1999 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL | |
03/15/1999 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
03/19/1999 | | COPY OF SUPERIOR COURT LETTER | |
03/26/1999 | | RECORD ON APPEAL (98CV795\98cv782) | |
03/30/1999 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN OPPOSITION to aple's mot to dismiss | |
03/30/1999 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
03/30/1999 | | RECEIVED - aplt's oppo to aple's mot to dismiss | |
05/17/1999 | | ORDERED that the motion of appellant for an extension of time to file the opposition is granted, and the Clerk shall file the lodged opposition of appellant. F/O thatthe motion of appellee Kirkpatrick J. Day to dismiss appeals is denied. (BY: AMW) | |
05/17/1999 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to appellee Day motion to dismiss | |
09/13/1999 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (4 pgs/HART) 4/8/98 proc. | |
09/13/1999 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #2 (12 pgs/Hart) 4/8/98 proc. | |
09/13/1999 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #3 (7 pgs/Hart) 4/6/98 proc. | |
09/13/1999 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
06/28/2000 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL (United Services Automobile Association) | |
06/28/2000 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
07/10/2000 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to Aple's motion to dismiss | |
07/12/2000 | | error | |
07/19/2000 | | ORDER DENY APLE MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL F/O that the brief of appallant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C App. R. 31. | |
09/01/2000 | | On consideration of this court's order of July 19, 2000___, directing appellant_ to file the brief within 40 days from the date of the order, an d it appearing that the brief has not yet been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the brief of appellant_ shall be filed within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject these appeals to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 14. | |
09/21/2000 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 20 days | |
09/21/2000 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
09/28/2000 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to aplt's mot for ext of time. | |
10/17/2000 | | On consideration of the motion of appellant_ for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and the opposition therto, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the brief of appellant shall be filed on or before October 23, 2000. Any further requests for extensions of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By: AMW) | |
10/27/2000 | | On consideration of this court's order of October 17, 2000, directing petitioner to file the brief on or before October 23, 2000, and it appearing that the brief has not yet been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the brief of petitioner shall be filed within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this_ appeal_ to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 14. (By: GP) | |
10/30/2000 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL | |
10/30/2000 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
11/13/2000 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN OPPOSITION | |
11/13/2000 | | RECEIVED - aplt's oppo to aple's renewed motio for dismissal | |
11/13/2000 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
11/16/2000 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF | |
11/16/2000 | | RECEIVED - Aplt's Brief | |
11/16/2000 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
11/21/2000 | | NOTICE RECEIVED - supp to the mot filed on 11/16/00. | |
11/30/2000 | | LETTER from aple's of intent to file mot for summary disposition. | |
12/18/2000 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE (filed by appellees Kirpatrick J. Day, Robert S. Day, Vicki Joyce Day and USAA) | |
12/18/2000 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
12/26/2000 | | TMC - Aple's motion for summary affirmance - Aplt's opposition - Aple's motion to dismiss appeal - Aplt's opposition | |
01/02/2001 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to mot for summary affirmance. | |
01/10/2001 | | ORD GRANT APLT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OPPOSITION to appellee Day's renewed motion to dismiss and the Clerk shall file the lodged opposition *** MORE *** | |
01/10/2001 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to appellee's renewed motion to dismiss | |
01/10/2001 | | ORDER DENY APLE MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL *** MORE *** | |
01/10/2001 | | ORDER GRANTING APLT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF and the Clerk shall file the lodged brief of appellant. *** MORE *** | |
01/10/2001 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
01/10/2001 | | ORDER DENY APPELLEE MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE F/O that the briefs of appellees shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 31. (by: TESTKN) | |
02/08/2001 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF (Kirpatrict J. Day, Robert S. Day, Vickie J. Day and United Services Automoble Association | |
02/08/2001 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
02/28/2001 | | {PPELLANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE aple's reply brief and motion for sanctions (dwm) | |
02/28/2001 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
03/01/2001 | | TMC - Aplt's motion to strike and for sanctions - Aple's opposition to motion to strike and for sanctions | |
03/09/2001 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - to aplt's motion for sanctions under rule 11 and motion to strike under rule 12 (f) (United Services Automobile Assocation) | |
03/13/2001 | | ORDER DENYING APPELLANT MOTION TO STRIKE *** MORE *** | |
03/13/2001 | | ORDER DENYING APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for sanctions. F/O that appellees, the Chhabras, shall file their brief or a statement that no brief will be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. Failure of appellees Chhabras to file theri brief will result in these appeals being scheduled on the briefs filed. (by: FARDKG) | |
04/27/2001 | | NOTICE RECEIVED from aplt re aple's misrepre- sentation. | |
05/25/2001 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION under Rule 11 of the rules of civil procedure that the court order that Mr. David Grimaldi and Miss Jill Reid Cummins respond as to whether aplt is being indemnified. | |
05/25/2001 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
05/29/2001 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - of defendants Day and USSA to co-defendant Kindig's motion motion under rule 11 o the rules of civil procedure that the court order that Mr. David Grimaldi and Miss Jill Reid Cummings respond as to whether aplt is being indemnified | |
06/01/2001 | | TMC - Aplt's motion under Rule 11 of the rules of civil procedure - Aple's opposition - Aplt's notice to the court - Aplt's reply | |
06/04/2001 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY- to oppo of defendents Day and USAA to co- def. Kindig's motion under rule 11 of the rules of civil procedure that the court order that Mr. David Grimaldi and Miss Jill Reid Cummmigs respond as to whether aplt is being indemnified | |
06/13/2001 | | NOTICE RECEIVED from appellant regarding making a determination on this appeal. | |
06/20/2001 | | ORDER DENYING APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for sanctions. F/O that appellant's notice to the court is struck from the record for failure to comply with D.C. App. R. 27(a). F/O that these appeals shall be scheduled for consideration before the mertis division as soon as the calendar permits. (by: SCFAKN) | |
06/29/2001 | | CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED - of David F. Grimaldi 1815 H. STREET, NW SUITE 420 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 202 293-0830 | |
07/05/2001 | | RECEIVED - copy of preaecipe w/copies of letters for law office | |
07/19/2001 | | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |
07/20/2001 | | NOTICE RECEIVED - filed by: aplt re: praecipe filed in superior court | |
07/30/2001 | | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |
08/06/2001 | | STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL | |
08/09/2001 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL REQUESTING ORAL ARGUMENT | Denied |
08/13/2001 | | RECEIVED - Copy of the Praecipe dated July 31, 2001, filed in the Superior Court by the parties to dismiss the case with prejudice as the matter has been settled. ta | |
08/16/2001 | | On consideration of the parties' stipulation of dismissal and the request of appellant for oral argument on the summary calendar of September 11, 2001, and it appearing that a praecipe of dismissal was filed in the Superior Court on July 31, 2001, it is ORDERED that appeals numbers 98-CV-782 and 98-CV-795 are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs. It is F/ORDERED that these appeals are removed from the summary calendar of September 11, 2001. It is F/ORDERED that appellant's request for oral argument is denied as moot. (TDRDWH) | |
08/16/2001 | | DISMISSED | |
09/07/2001 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |