judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

JOHN BURKE V. DC DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT SVCS.

Case Information: 97-AA-1816
Short Caption:JOHN BURKE V. DC DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT SVCS.Classification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Worker's Compensation
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:DIR.DKT. 89-74Filed Date:11/21/1997

Opening Event Date:11/21/1997Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:12/28/2000Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:05/15/2001

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerJohn Burke N
Joseph H. Koonz NN
Frank R. KearneyYN
RespondentD.C. Department of Employment Services - Worker's Comp.N
Charles L. Reischel NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
11/18/1997PETITIONER'S DOCKETING STATEMENT
11/21/1997PETITION FOR REVIEW
11/21/1997CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD & Michael A. Milwee
09/26/2000 It appearing that the petition for review was served on November 21, 1997________, and the administrative record was due to be filed with this court on January 7, 1998___________ (See D.C. App. R. 17), and has not yet been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that respondent shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, file the administrative record, accompanied by a motion for leave to late file the record out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the record or to request an extension of time within which to do so. (By: GP)
10/17/2000RESP MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE THE RECORD
11/20/2000ORD GRT RESP MO TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE THE RECORD to the extent that respondent shall,w/in 15 days, file the record on appeal. (by: GP) sw
12/15/2000RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THE RECORD
12/15/2000RECEIVED - Record
12/28/2000 On consideration of the motion of respondent for leave to late file the administrative record, time having expired, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the lodged administrative record is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief_ of petitioner_ shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief_ of respondent_ and ___________ shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP_) sw
12/28/2000RECORD ON APPEAL
12/28/2000RECORD COMPLETED
12/28/2000error
02/07/2001PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF no oppo
02/07/2001RECEIVED-petitioner's brief on appeal
02/07/2001MOTION(S) FEE PAID
02/13/2001RECEIVED - statement in lieu of brief
02/26/2001ORDER GRANTING PTNR MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEFand the Clerk shall file the lodged brief of petitioner. F/O that respondent shall, w/in 20 days, show cause why the statement in lieu of brief should not be stricken and the District directed to file a brief. See Surgent v. DC, 683 A.2d 493,496 no.2(D.C. 1996). (AMW) sw
02/26/2001PETITIONER'S BRIEF
03/08/2001ORDERED,ss, that this court's order of Feb. 26, 2001, is hereby amended to the extent that it reflects the correct respondent in this case. F/O that respondent shall, w/in 20 days, show cause why the statement in lieu of brief should not be stricken and the District directed to file a brief. See Surgent v. DC, 683 A.2d 493, 496 no.2(D.C. 1996). sw
03/16/2001RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
04/05/2001RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO REMAND
04/13/2001STATEMENT - from petitioner of non representation
04/23/2001ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT MOTION TO REMAND and this case is hereby remanded to the agency for further administrative proceedings consistent with respondent's motion. (AMW) sw
04/23/2001REMANDED
05/15/2001MANDATE ISSUED