Events |
Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
01/11/1996 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |
01/11/1996 | | $50.00 DOCKETING FEE | |
01/11/1996 | | DESIGNATION OF RECORD | |
01/11/1996 | | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) | |
02/29/1996 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE with 95CV1242 & 96CV2 | |
02/29/1996 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
03/26/1996 | | COUNTER DESIGNATION OF RECORD | |
06/05/1996 | | RECEIVED - aplt's motion to expedite and to consolidate filed in 95cv1242 and 96cv2 | |
06/17/1996 | | RECORD ON APPEAL/with exhibits attached to the original record | |
07/03/1996 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION - for leave to file supplemental reply of aplts with respect to aplts motion to expedite appeal filed with 95cv1242, 96cv2, | |
07/03/1996 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
08/14/1996 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (33 pages--Tape) (12/15/95 proc.) | |
08/15/1996 | | ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE and appeals nos. 95-CV-1242, 96-CV-2, 96-CV-13, 96-CV-642 and 96-AA-1007 are consolidated for all purposes. (by: FARDPY) | |
08/15/1996 | | ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE and the Clerk shall enter Jay Hessey, Joseph McLaughlin, and Emaluel Pastreich on the docket as intervenors in appeal no. 96-AA-1007. F/O that the motion of appellants for leave to file the supplemental reply with regard to appellants' motion to expedite appeal, construed as a motion to supplement appellants' reply to the Distirct's opposition to appellants' motion to expedite, is granted. F/O that the motions of appellants and petitioners for expedited consideration are granted, and the parties shall file summary disposition motions pursuant to D.C. App. R. 27. (g) within 10 days from the date of this order. (by: FARDPY) | |
08/20/1996 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file the designation of record no oppo | |
08/20/1996 | | RECEIVED - respondent's designation of record w/ attachment in white box | |
08/23/1996 | | ORDER GRANT RESP MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION and the record in appeal no. 96-CV-1007 is filed. (BY: GP). | |
08/23/1996 | | RECORD ON APPEAL (96-CV-1007) | |
08/26/1996 | | PETITIONERS & appellants MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to summarily reverse judgments of the Superior Court and orders of the Board of ELections and Ethics for 96 AA 1007, 95 CV 1242, 96 CV 2, 96 CV 13 & 96 CV 642 | |
08/26/1996 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
08/26/1996 | | PETITIONER'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to file legislative history. | |
08/26/1996 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
08/26/1996 | | Motion of the Disitrict of Columbia for three-day extension of time in which to file motion for summary disposition. | |
08/26/1996 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to affirm. | |
08/26/1996 | | INTERVENOR'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for summary affirmance. | |
08/26/1996 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
08/29/1996 | | PETITIONER'S & APPELLANTS OPPOSITION TO MOTION THE RESPONDENT FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION for 96 CV 1007, 95 CV 1242, 96 CV 2, 96 CV 13 & 96 CV 642 | |
08/29/1996 | | RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE | |
09/03/1996 | | INTERVENOR'S OPPOSITION - to motion for summary reversal | |
09/03/1996 | | PETITIONER'S OPPOSITION to motion to affirm by respondent board of elections and to intervenor's motion for summary affirmance. | |
09/03/1996 | | PETITIONER'S OPPOSITION to D.C.'s mot. for summary affirmance | |
09/04/1996 | | RESPONDENT'S REPLY to opposition to motion for summary affirmance for 96 AA 1007, 95 CV 1242, 96 CV 2 & 96 CV 13 | |
09/05/1996 | | TMC - Motion of petitioners and appellants to summarily reverse judgments of the superior court and orders of the board of elections and ethics - Aplt's motion to file legislative history - Motion of the district of columbia for three-day ext. of time in which to file motion for summary disposition - Motion to affirm - Intervenors' motion for summary affirmance - Opposition of petitioners to motion to affirm by respondent board of elections and to intervervenors' motion for summary affirmance - Opposition of petitioners to motion of the district of columbia for ext. of time to file for summary disposition - Motion of the district of columbia for summary affirmance - Intervenors' opposition to motion for summary reversal - Opposition of petitioners to the motion of the district of columbia for summary affirmance - Reply of respondent to oppo. to motion for masaf Petitioner's/appellant's reply to intervenors' opposition to aplt's motion for summary reversal (9/5/96) - Initiative proponents' reply to plaintiffs-aples opposition to the proponents' motion for summary affirmance - Aplt's reply to initiative proponents' oppo to aplt's motion to file legislative history (9/11/96) | |
09/05/1996 | | PETITIONER'S REPLY - to intervenors' opposition to aplt's motion for summary reversal | |
09/05/1996 | | APPELLEES OPPOSITION to appellants' motion to file legislative history | |
09/06/1996 | | APPELLEE'S REPLY - initiative proponents' to plaintiff-appellees' opposition to the proponents' motion for summary affirmance 96cv13 | |
09/11/1996 | | PETITIONER'S REPLY - to initiative proponents' opposition to aplt's motion to file legislative history | |
09/19/1996 | | ORDER, sua sponte, that this matter is scheduled for oral argument on the cross motions for summary disposition on Tuesday, September 24, 1996, at 3:00 p.m. The parties are to be present in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals courtroom, located at 500 Indiana Ave., NW, sixth floor, Washington, DC, no later than 2:55 p.m. (By: SC, FA, RE) | |
09/23/1996 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |
09/24/1996 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
09/24/1996 | | ARGUED (SC,FA,RD) Vincent Mark Policy, Esquire, for appellant. James McKay, Esquire,for appellee. Katherine H. Meyer, Esquire, for appellee. Kenneth J. McAHre, Esquire, for appellee. | |
09/25/1996 | | MISCELLANEOUS - transcript from intervenor | |
09/26/1996 | | LETTER from pet. objecting to intervenor's submission of transcripts to the court | |
10/04/1996 | | AFFIRMED Opinion affirming the judgments of the Superior Court; denying the petition for review; and issuing the mandate forthwith. (SC,FA,RD) (Opinion released in xeroxed form this date.) | |
10/04/1996 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
10/07/1996 | | LETTER -from General Counsel re: correction on opinion | |