| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 09/03/1997 | | DISCIPLINARY LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel with a certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of the State of California disbarring the above-named attorney. | |
| 09/18/1997 | | ORDER It appearing that the Court has received a certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of the State of California disbarring respondent, it is accordingly, pursuant to Rule XI, Sec 11 (d) of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pending final disposition of this proceeding, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that Bar Counsel inform the Board on Professional Responsibility of his position regarding reciprocal discipline within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, respondent shall show cause before the Board on Professional Responsibility, if cause there be, within 10 days why identical, greater or lesser discipline should not be imposed in the District of Columbia. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Board on Professional Responsibility is directed to recommend promptly thereafter to this court whether identical, greater or lesser discipline should be imposed as reciprocal discipline or whether the Board instead elects to proceed de novo pursuant to Rule XI, Sec 11. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's attention is drawn to the requirement of D.C. Bar Rule XI, Sec 14 relating to disbarred attorneys and to the provisions of Sec 16 (c) dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with Sec 14, including the filing of the required affidavit. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall cause a copy of this order and the order of the Supreme Court of the State of California to be directed to the Chair of the Board on Professional Responsibility and transmitted to the respondent. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Bar Counsel advise the Court if the matter is concluded without the necessity of further court action. (AMW) | |
| 10/27/1997 | | AFFIDAVIT of respondent in compliance with DC Bar Rule XI, SS14. | |
| 03/11/1998 | | REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD ON PROF. RESP. that reciprocal discipline should be imposed in this case. That respondent be disbarred, effective nunc pro tunc to August 12, 1992. Also, see dissenting opinion by Paul L. Knight, Esquire. | |
| 03/18/1998 | | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel noting its exception to the Report & Recommendation with respect to the timing of respondent's reciprocal disbarment. | |
| 03/20/1998 | | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF (BPR) to 30 days after the filing of Bar Counsel'sbrief. | |
| 04/08/1998 | | ORDER On consideration of the exceptions of Bar Counsel filed in response to the Board on Professional Responsibility's report and recommendation filed on March 11, 1998, and the Board on Professional Responsibility's motion for leave to file brief, it is ORDERED that the Board on Professional Responsibility's motion for leave to file brief is granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of Bar Counsel shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of respondent and the Board on Professional Responsibility shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. (GP) | |
| 04/21/1998 | | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel with a certified copy of an order of the Court of Appeal of the State of California for the Second Appel- late District, Division Five, affirming respondentcriminal conviction. | |
| 05/11/1998 | | PETITIONER'S BRIEF (Bar Counsel) | |
| 06/10/1998 | | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF (BPR) for a 30 day extension to and including July 10, 1998 (no oppo). | |
| 06/15/1998 | | ORDER On consideration of the motion of the Board on Professional Responsibility for an extension of time in which to file brief, and it appearing that respondent has requested via the Board on Professional Responsibility an extension of time in which to file his brief, and there appearing to be no opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the motions of the Board on Professional Responsibility and respondent are granted and the briefs of both the Board on Professional Responsibility and respondent shall be filed on or before July 10, 1998. (GP) | |
| 07/10/1998 | | PETITIONER'S BRIEF (BPR) | |
| 07/22/1998 | | RECEIVED respondent's brief | |
| 07/22/1998 | | RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF | |
| 07/23/1998 | | ORDER On consideration of the consent motion of respondent for leave to file the lodged one page brief supporting the Board on Professional Responsibility's brief submitted to the Court on July 10, 1998, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and the lodged brief is filed. (GP) | |
| 07/23/1998 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
| 07/23/1998 | | RESPONDENT'S BRIEF | |
| 07/23/1998 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
| 07/27/1998 | | PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF | |
| 07/27/1998 | | PETITIONER'S ANSWER/RESPONSE (BPR) to respondent's motion to file brief. | |
| 10/09/1998 | | LETTER TO COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |
| 10/21/1998 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING (BPR) | |
| 10/22/1998 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING from the Office of Bar Counsel. | |
| 10/23/1998 | | LETTER from the BPR making a correction to an LTRIN filed on 10/21/98. | |
| 12/31/1998 | | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |
| 02/03/1999 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
| 02/03/1999 | | ARGUED (WG,RD,KE) Michael S. Frisch, Esquire, for appellant. Elizabeth J. Branda, Esquire, for appellee. A. George Glasco, Esquire, for appellee. | |
| 03/25/1999 | | DISBARMENT Accordingly, respondent is disbarred, effective nunc pro tunc to August 12, 1992. (By WA, RD, KN) | |