TINA JOHNSON V. ZANDRA EALEY

Case Information: 96-CV-0221
Short Caption:	TINA JOHNSON V. ZANDRA EALEY	Classification:	Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:	LT57519-95	Filed Date:	03/04/1996
Opening Event Date:	03/04/1996	Case Status:	Closed
Record Completed:		Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:		Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:	03/11/1997

Events
Event Date	Status	Description	Result
03/04/1996		NOTICE OF APPEAL
03/04/1996		RECEIVED appellant's motion for stay pending appeal (IFP pending)
03/04/1996		APPELLANT'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
03/05/1996		APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION -to aplt's emergency motion for stay pending appeal
03/05/1996		TMC - Aplt's motion & affidavit to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis - Aplt's motion for stay pending appeal - Aple's opposition
03/06/1996		ORDER GRANT APLT MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and the Clerk shall file the ldoged motion for stay pending appeal. (by: STRZKN)
03/06/1996		APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY of the judgment and writ of possession pending appeal.
03/06/1996		ORDER GRANTING APLT'S MOTION FOR STAY of the judgment and writ of possession pending appeal without prejudice to appellee's right to seek modification of the stay in the event of any default in the payment of rent or other changed circumstances.
03/12/1996		DESIGNATION OF RECORD
03/12/1996		STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S)
03/13/1996		APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT
08/01/1996		RECORD ON APPEAL
08/13/1996		APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION emergency motion to vacate or modify stay pending appeal
08/13/1996		MOTION(S) FEE PAID
08/19/1996		APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to aple's motion to vacate
08/19/1996		TMC - Aple's motion to vacate or modify stay - Aplt's opposition
08/30/1996		ORDER DENY APLE MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to vacate or modify the stay without prejudice to appellee filing an appropriate motion requesting the imposition of a protective order with the trial court. F/O that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. Any request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (by: STRZKN)
09/06/1996		APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION - for entry of a bond or in the alternative for a protective order
09/06/1996		MOTION(S) FEE PAID
09/10/1996		TMC - Aple's motion for entry of a bond or in the alternative for a protective order
09/16/1996		APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to hold appellee's motion for entry of a bond or protective order and appelleant's time for response thereto in abeyance. (consent)
10/09/1996		APPELLANT'S BRIEF
10/24/1996		SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (4 pages--Tape) (2/29/96 proc.)
10/25/1996		RECEIVED- aplt's oppositon to aple's motion to vacate or modify stay pending appeal (need motion to late file) due 9/30/96
11/12/1996		NOTICE SENT - to aplt re: motion for opposition recvd on 10/25/96
11/18/1996		APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION - to aple's motion to vacate or modify stay pending appeal
11/26/1996		ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to hold in abeyance, and the Clerk shall file the lodged opposition to the motion for entry of a protective order. (by: STRZKN)
11/26/1996		ORDER DENYING APLE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for entry of a protective order. (by: STRZKN)
01/14/1997		ORDERED that appellee shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good acuse for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in this appeal being scheduled for consideration on the record on appeal and appellant's brief alone. (BY: GP)
01/21/1997		APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL
02/07/1997		ORDERED that the stay of the judgement entered on March 6, 1996, is hereby vacated. It is F/O that the motion to dismiss is granted, and this appeal is dismissed, consistent with the settlement agreement. See D.C. App. R. 42(b). It is F/O that this case is hereby remanded to the D.C. Superior Court for the vacation of the February 13, 1996, default judgment, and for further proceedings consistent with the settlement agreement. (BY: AMW)
02/07/1997		DISMISSED
03/11/1997		MANDATE ISSUED