Log In
judyrecords
search tips
770 million+
United States Court Cases

California First Appellate District Record

The People v. Odom Division 1

Parties and Attorneys

The People v. Odom
Division 1
Case Number A160316
Party Attorney
The People : Plaintiff and Respondent
Office of the Attorney General
455 Golden Gate Avenue - Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004

Elizabeth Winsor Hereford
California Attorney General's Office
455 Golden Gate Ave Ste 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102

Ryan Bigoski Odom : Defendant and Appellant
California Institution for Women
16756 Chino-Corona Road
Corona, CA 92880
First District Appellate Project
First District Appellate Project
475 Fourteenth Street, Suite 650
Oakland, CA 94612

Paul Couenhoven
1569 Solano Avenue
PMB 286
Berkeley, CA 94707



Case Summary

Trial Court Case:
VCR211543
Court of Appeal Case:
A160316
Supreme Court Case:
S267879
Court of Appeal Opinion:
[ PDF ] [ DOC ]
Caution: For information on when opinions may be cited or relied upon, click here .
Division:
1
Case Caption:
The People v. Odom
Case Type:
CR
Filing Date:
05/26/2020
Completion Date:
01/07/2022
Oral Argument Date/Time:


Docket (Register of Actions)

The People v. Odom
Division 1
Case Number A160316
Date Description Notes
06/17/2020 Notice of appeal lodged/received (criminal).
07/06/2020 Record on appeal filed. CT-1
07/06/2020 Letter sent to counsel re: Record filed today. AOB due in 40 days.
08/18/2020 Filed declaration of: Declaration in support of appointment. *Confidential*
08/18/2020 Counsel appointment order filed. Paul Couenhoven appointed for appellant - 40 days.
09/18/2020 Appellant's opening brief. Defendant and Appellant: Ryan Bigoski Odom
Attorney: Paul Couenhoven
09/18/2020 Request for judicial notice filed.
09/23/2020 Ruling on request for judicial notice deferred. BY THE COURT:


Appellant's request for judicial notice filed on September 18, 2020, is deferred until consideration of the merits of the appeal. Respondent may file a response to the request when it files its respondent's brief.
10/16/2020 Requested - extension of time.
10/16/2020 Granted - extension of time.
11/18/2020 Requested - extension of time.
11/18/2020 Granted - extension of time.
12/23/2020 Respondent notified re failure to file respondent's brief. Plaintiff and Respondent: The People
01/22/2021 Respondent's brief. Plaintiff and Respondent: The People
Attorney: Office of the Attorney General Two extensions granted for a total of 60 days:
10/16/2020 Requested - extension of time. Requested for 11/18/2020 By 30 Day(s)
10/16/2020 Granted - extension of time. Due on 11/18/2020 By 30 Day(s)
11/18/2020 Requested - extension of time. Requested for 12/18/2020 By 30 Day(s)
11/18/2020 Granted - extension of time. Due on 12/18/2020 By 30 Day(s)
01/22/2021 Opposition filed. Opposition to appellant's request for judicial notice.
02/08/2021 Appellant's reply brief. Defendant and Appellant: Ryan Bigoski Odom
Attorney: Paul Couenhoven
02/10/2021 Case fully briefed.
02/11/2021 Case on conference list. 21-03
02/11/2021 Oral argument waiver notice sent.
02/17/2021 Record to court for review.
02/24/2021 Argument waived by: (no response - 10 day notice) 02/22/2021
02/25/2021 Opinion filed. (Signed Unpublished) The order denying defendant's resentencing petitions under section 1170.95 is affirmed.
03/30/2021 Service copy of petition for review received.
05/12/2021 Petition for review granted in Supreme Court. The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in People v. Lewis, S260598 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.

Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, Kruger, Groban and Jenkins, JJ.
12/22/2021 Supreme Court order filed re: Review in the above-captioned matter, which was granted and held for People v. Lewis (2021) 11 Cal.5th 952, is hereby dismissed. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(b)(1).)

Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Corrigan, Liu, Kruger, Groban and Jenkins, JJ.
01/07/2022 Remittitur issued.
01/07/2022 Case complete.


Briefs

The People v. Odom
Division 1
Case Number A160316
Brief Due Date Date Filed Party and Attorney Notes
Appellant's opening brief. 09/18/2020 Defendant and Appellant: Ryan Bigoski Odom
Attorney: Paul Couenhoven

Respondent notified re failure to file respondent's brief. 12/23/2020 Plaintiff and Respondent: The People
Respondent's brief. 01/22/2021 Plaintiff and Respondent: The People
Attorney: Office of the Attorney General
Two extensions granted for a total of 60 days: 10/16/2020 Requested - extension of time. Requested for 11/18/2020 By 30 Day(s) 10/16/2020 Granted - extension of time. Due on 11/18/2020 By 30 Day(s) 11/18/2020 Requested - extension of time. Requested for 12/18/2020 By 30 Day(s) 11/18/2020 Granted - extension of time. Due on 12/18/2020 By 30 Day(s)
Appellant's reply brief. 02/08/2021 Defendant and Appellant: Ryan Bigoski Odom
Attorney: Paul Couenhoven



Future Scheduled Actions

The People v. Odom
Division 1
Case Number A160316

No information found.



Disposition

The People v. Odom
Division 1
Case Number A160316
Description:
Affirmed in full
Date:
02/25/2021
Disposition Type:
Final
The order denying defendant's resentencing petitions under section 1170.95 is affirmed.
Publication Status:
Signed Unpublished
Author:
Banke, Kathleen M.
Participants:
Margulies, Sandra Lynn (Concur)
Sanchez, Gabriel P. (Concur)
Case Citation:
none


Trial Court

The People v. Odom
Division 1
Case Number A160316
Trial Court Name:
Solano County Superior Court - Main
County:
Solano
Trial Court Case Number:
VCR211543
Trial Court Judge:
Getty, Wendy
Trial Court Judgment Date:
04/26/2020