judyrecords
600 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

VADER (MICHEAL) VS. WARDEN

Case Information: 33427
Short Caption:VADER (MICHEAL) VS. WARDENCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Churchill Co. - Tenth Judicial District - 19846Classification:Criminal Appeal - Other - Post-Conviction/Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:05/11/1999How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
12/04/1998Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
12/04/1998Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 98-00265
01/21/1999MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Extension of Time Within Which to file Respondent's Answering Brief. 99-00430
02/01/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Record due: 120 days. [fn1]--The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court. 99-00671
03/01/1999MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Extension of Time to File Respondent's Answering Brief. 99-01366
03/08/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. Appellant has not been granted permission to file documents in this matter in proper person, and thus the opening brief was received and not filed. It appears that counsel for the state is proceeding under the assumption that she must file an answering brief. We deny the state's motions for extensions to file the answering brief. This does not preclude the state from responding to appellant's opening brief. If the state still wishes to file an answering brief, the state may resubmit a motion to extend the time. 99-01588
05/11/1999Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Copy. Vols. 1 and 2. Mailed on 5/7/99. 99-03791
05/11/1999Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
02/22/2001Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. Having reviewed the record on appeal, we conclude that appellant is not entitled to relief and that briefing and oral argument are unwarranted. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." fn9[We have considered all proper person documents filed or received in this matter, and we conclude that the relief requested is not warranted.] SNP00A-1-CY/RR/NB 01-03300
03/20/2001RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 01-03714
03/20/2001Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
03/28/2001RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on March 21, 2001. 01-03714