judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

ISTRICE VS. CITY OF SPARKS

Case Information: 36045
Short Caption:ISTRICE VS. CITY OF SPARKSCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 36393
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV9906410Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Leavitt, MaupinCase Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:05/05/2000 / Rosenauer, CeciliaSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:05/01/2001How Submitted:On Briefs

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
05/02/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Law Offices of William W. Harrison--check no. 7210.
05/02/2000Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 00-07167
05/05/2000Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Cecilia Rosenauer. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts and docketing statement suspended pending further order of this court.)
07/05/2000Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. 00-11414
07/05/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to File Docketing Statement. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) Due Date: 15 days
07/20/2000Settlement Order/ProceduralFiled Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this appeal. Upon the filing of the docketing statement, this court shall conduct a preliminary jurisdictional review of this appeal. Appellant: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file and serve opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). 00-12518
07/20/2000OtherDisqualification of Justice Leavitt. Law firm of Hale Lane Peek Dennison Howard & Anderson.
07/20/2000Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 00-12542
07/26/2000Docketing StatementFiled Response to Docketing Statement. 00-12989
08/04/2000Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request. 00-13524
11/13/2000BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: Reno/Carson Msgr. 11/13/00. 00-19791
11/13/2000AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. 00-19793
12/07/2000MotionFiled Stipulation and Order. Brief due: January 10, 2001. 00-21418
12/08/2000MotionFiled Stipulation and Order. Brief due: January 10, 2001. 00-21498
01/11/2001BriefFiled Answering Brief. Mailed on: 01/10/01. 01-00667
01/11/2001AppendixFiled Appendix to Answering Brief. Vols. 1 and 2. 01-00669
01/11/2001Notice/IncomingFiled Joinder. To Respondent City of Sparks' Answering Brief. 01-00670
02/02/2001BriefFiled Reply Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 02/02/01. 01-02204
05/01/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Submit on Briefs. Cause appearing, oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted for decision to the Northern Nevada Panel as of the date of this order on the briefs filed herein. 01-07276
05/01/2001Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. NNP01A-MS/DA/RR.
05/14/2001MotionFiled Motion. Request for the Court to Take Judicial Notice of the Decision on Appeal by The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Regarding the Underlying Appeal of the Decision of the Federal District Court. 01-07978
06/06/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. On May 14, 2001, appellants filed a motion requesting this court to take judicial notice of a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit entered on May 8, 2001, in Docket Number 99-17574. The decision vacates the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada which is related to the issue on appeal in the matter before this court. We grant appellants' unopposed motion. 01-09460
06/12/2001Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Remand. In light of the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' order of May 8, 2001, vacating and remanding the federal district court's order dismissing the Istrices federal claim, upon which the order below was based, we "REMAND this matter to the district court." NNP01A-MS/DA/RR 01-09788
06/28/2001OtherDisqualification of Justice Maupin. Law firm of Hale Lane Peek Dennison Howard & Anderson.
07/10/2001RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 01-10328
07/10/2001Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
07/25/2001RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on July 17, 2001. 01-10328