| Case Information: 39786 | |||
| Short Caption: | RODRIGUEZ VS. DIST. CT. (EDDOWES) | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 37948 , 39273 , 39726 , 39905 , 42991 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - D241955 | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Civil - Proper Person Writ Petition |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 06/17/2002 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | ||
| 06/17/2002 | Petition/Writ | Filed Proper Person Petition for Writ. Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Ordering Petitioners Immediate Release from Jail and Related Relief. | 02-10442 | |
| 06/17/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days | ||
| 08/28/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. Denying Stay. Petitioner has moved to stay a hearing on a subsequent motion for contempt, contending that he is entitled to appointed counsel to represent him. fn1[Although petitioner was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person document received from him.] We conclude that petitioner has not met his burden of demonstrating that a stay is appropriate, and so deny his motion. | 02-14760 | |
| 11/06/2003 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Petition. Order of Affirmance (Docket No. 39273) and Dismissing Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Docket No. 39786). Docket No. 39273 is a proper persona appeal from a final divorce decree. Docket No. 39786 is an original proper person petition for a writ of mandamus. Having concluded that the district court did not abuse its discretion concerning the divorce decree, we affirm the district court's order in Docket No. 39273. This court's duty is to decide actual controversies, not to give opinions on moot questions. Accordingly, ' . . . we dismiss this petition as moot.' fn13[We have considered all other contentions raised by Rodriguez, and conclude that they lack merit. Although Rodriguez was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from him. We note that Rodriguez's failure to pay the filing fee in Docket No. 39786, constitutes an additional basis for denying the writ petition. NRAP 21(e).] NNP04S-NB/MS/MG. Nos. 39273/39786 – cases are not consolidated. | 03-18504 | |
| 11/26/2003 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $150 from Kay Rodriguez-check no. 4340. | ||
| 12/09/2003 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." fn1[ NRAP 40(c). We direct the clerk of this court to file the rehearing petition, provisionally received on November 26, 2003. See NRAP 46(b).] NNP04S-NB/MS/MG. Nos. 39273/39786 - cases are not consolidated. | 03-20436 | |
| 12/09/2003 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Proper Person Petition for Rehearing. Petition for Rehearing concerning Supreme Court's Order of Affirmance (docket no. 39273) and Dismissing Petition for Writ of Mandamus (docket no. 39786). | 03-19806 | |
| 01/06/2004 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | 04-00144 | |
| 01/06/2004 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 01/26/2004 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order Denying En Banc Reconsideration. fn1[NRAP 40A(a).] We have reviewed appellant/petitioner's submissions, and we conclude that en banc reconsideration is not warranted. Accordingly, we "ORDER the petition DENIED." fn2[Although appellant/petitioner was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from him, and we deny as moot the relief requested therein. As the Honorable Myron E. Leavitt, Justice died in office on January 9, 2004, this matter was decided by a six-justice court.] EN BANC. Nos. 39273/39786 - cases are not consolidated. | 04-01491 | |
| 03/03/2004 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice from U.S. Supreme Court\Certiorari Denied. A petition for a writ of certiorari was filed February 17, 2003 and placed on the docket as Case No. 03-8998. | 04-03997 | |
| 05/04/2004 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice from U.S. Supreme Court\Certiorari Granted. The petition for a writ of ceritorari is denied. | 04-08140 | |