| Docket Entries |
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 06/13/2002 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Steve E. Wenzel--check no. 3004. | | |
| 06/13/2002 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | | 02-10282
|
| 06/24/2002 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Hon. Mario G. Recanzone. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.) | | |
| 06/27/2002 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | | 02-11060
|
| 06/28/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Letter. Mario G. Recanzone. (Docketing statement) | | |
| 08/19/2002 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. | | 02-14100
|
| 08/26/2002 | Settlement Order/Procedural | Filed Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement. We reinstate the time deadlines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs. Appellant: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file and serve opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). | | 02-14560
|
| 09/05/2002 | Transcript Request | Filed Certificate of No Transcript Request. | | 02-15342
|
| 09/10/2002 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Request that Appellant Comply with NRAP 9 Regarding Reporter's Transcript. | | 02-15644
|
| 09/11/2002 | Transcript | Filed Transcript. Proceedings: March 18, 2002 (2) and March 19-20, 2002. Court Reporter: Isolde Zihn. | | 02-15804
|
| 09/17/2002 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Notice of Compliance with NRAP 9 (Reporter's Transcript). | | 02-16204
|
| 11/19/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion for Stay. Motion for Stay of Appeal Process. | | 02-19927
|
| 03/21/2003 | Motion | Filed Stipulation. Stipulation to Consolidate Appeals. Nos. 39769/40438. | | 03-04900
|
| 04/01/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Consolidation. We approve the stipulation of March 21, 2003, and consolidate these appeals for all appellate purposes. On November 19, 2002, appellants moved this court to stay the briefing in these consolidated appeals pending the district court's resolution of a motion regarding attorney fees. Our review of the documents filed with this court indicates that the district court entered an order on December 10, 2002, that appears to resolve all issues regarding attorney fees. We deny, as moot, appellants' motions for stay. The settlement judge has filed a status report recommending that the appeal in Docket No. 40438 be removed from the settlement program. We remove the appeal from the settlement conference program and reinstate briefing. Appellants shall have 60 days from the date of this order to file a single opening brief and appendix that addresses all issues being raised in these consolidated appeals. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). Nos. 39769/40438. | | 03-05419
|
| 04/14/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. to file Docketing Statement. Appellants shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, file and serve the docketing statement in Docket No. 40438. fn1[Although these consolidated appeals arise out of the same district court action, the appeals challenge different orders. To assist this court in conducting jurisdictional screening of the appeals, a docketing statement is required for each appeal.] | | 03-06187
|
| 04/24/2003 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. Nos. 39769/40438. | | 03-07023
|
| 06/02/2003 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. Nos. 39769/40438. | | 03-09217
|
| 06/02/2003 | Appendix | Filed Joint Appendix. Vols. 1 through 5. Nos. 39769/40438. | | 03-09218
|
| 06/25/2003 | Motion | Filed Stipulation and Order. Brief due: August 5, 2003. Nos. 39769/40438. | | 03-10645
|
| 08/05/2003 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Nos. 39769/40438 | | 03-13151
|
| 08/07/2003 | Order/Clerk's | Filed Clerk's Order Granting Motion. filed August 5, 2003. Respondent shall have until August 11, 2003, to file and serve the answering brief. Nos. 39769/40438. (03-13213) | | 03-13213
|
| 08/12/2003 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. Nos. 39769/40438. | | 03-13448
|
| 09/05/2003 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Appellants' Rule 26 Motion for Enlargement of Time to file Reply Brief. Nos. 39769/40438. (03-14935) | | 03-14935
|
| 09/10/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. filed September 5, 2003. Appellants shall have until November 21, 2003, to file and serve the reply brief. No further extensions of time shall be permitted absent demonstration of extreme and unforeseeable circumstances. Counsel's caseload will not be deemed such a circumstance. Nos. 39769/40438. (03-15132) | | 03-15132
|
| 09/10/2003 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Errata. Errata to Respondent's Answering Brief. Nos. 39769/40438. | | 03-15158
|
| 11/21/2003 | Brief | Filed Reply Brief. Nos. 39769/40438. | | 03-19495
|
| 01/27/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. In April 2003, the appeals were consolidated. Appellant shall have 30 days from this order's date to show cause why the appeal in docket No.39769 should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Failure to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction may result in the dismissal of the appeal in docket No. 39769, thereby limiting appellate review to the district court's attorney fee orders in Docket No. 40438. Respondent may file any reply within 10 days from the date that appellants' response is served. Nos. 39769/40438. (04-01610) | | 04-01610
|
| 02/25/2004 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Appellants' Response to this Court's January 27, 2004 Order to Show Cause. Nos. 39769/40438 | | 04-03636
|
| 03/09/2004 | Motion | Filed Reply to Response. Reply of Respondent Dale Denio to Appellants' Response to Order to Show Cause. Nos. 39769/40438. | | 04-04474
|
| 07/28/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Allowing Appeal to Proceed. In April 2003, the appeals were consolidated. When our preliminary review of the docketing statement and the NRAP 3(e) documents revealed a potential jurisdictional defect in the appeal docketed as No. 39769, we ordered appellants to show cause why that appeal should not be dismissed. We conclude that appellants' second motion to alter and amend was not an NRCP 52(b) or 59(e) tolling motion. The second motion renewed the first motion, which, as respondent noted below, simply 'rehash[ed] arguments and evidence unsuccessfully advanced at trial. Consequently, appellants' notice of appeal designating the May 23, 2002 judgment was not rendered ineffective by being filed before the district court resolved appellants' second motion. Accordingly, this appeal shall proceed as briefed. Nos. 39769/40436. (04-13704) | | 04-13704
|
| 03/02/2005 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Submit on Briefs. Order Submitting for Decision Without Oral Argument. Cause appearing, oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted for decision to the Northern Nevada Panel as of the date of this order on the briefs filed herein. Nos. 39769/40438. (05-04103) | | 05-04103
|
| 03/02/2005 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. Before the Northern Nevada Panel. NNP05-WM/MD/RP. Nos. 39769/40438. | | |
| 05/17/2005 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding With Instructions. "We reverse that portion of the district court's judgment awarding the entire interest in the second option to Denio, affirm the remainder and remand this matter to the district court." Nos. 39769/40438. | | 05-09619
|
| 06/14/2005 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | | 05-09746
|
| 06/14/2005 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | | |
| 06/27/2005 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by District Court Clerk on June 16, 2005. | | 05-09746
|