judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

MITCHELL (DANIEL) VS. STATE

Case Information: 40070
Short Caption:MITCHELL (DANIEL) VS. STATECourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C176802Classification:Criminal Appeal - Other - Post-Conviction/Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:12/13/2002How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
08/15/2002Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
08/15/2002Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 02-13967
08/21/2002Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Transmit Required Document. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order filed 8/16/02. Due Date: 10 days
08/28/2002Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled District Court Order/Judgment. Certified copy of order/judgment of conviction filed in district court on: August 16, 2002. 02-14864
09/03/2002Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. 02-15202
09/13/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Record due: 120 days. NRAP 11(a)(2) (the complete record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well as any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings). The record shall include a transcript of the proceedings conducted below on July 25, 2002. fn2[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 02-16007
10/14/2002TranscriptFiled Transcript. Proceedings: July 25, 2002. Court Reporter: Joseph A. D'Amato. 02-17721
12/13/2002Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Copy. Vols. 1 and 2. 02-21349
12/13/2002Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
07/02/2003Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. We conclude that Mitchell is not entitled to relief and that briefing and oral argument are unwarranted. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." fn13[We have considered all proper person documents filed or received in this matter, and we conclude that the relief requested is not warranted.] NNP03-RR/WM/MG 03-11088
07/29/2003RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 03-11176
07/29/2003Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
08/14/2003RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on July 31, 2003. 03-11176